What are the potential dangers of such a federally mandated REAL ID?
What are the potential dangers of such a federally mandated REAL ID?
Many experts agree that REAL ID can be a threat to health freedom and can be used as the Chinese style social credit score as it is currently in China, U.K., and Australia. Twila Brase stated “REAL ID is a national ID, it is a federal takeover of state and individual sovereignty, it is an usurpation of state rights and individual rights that we have under Constitution.”
Brase stated that “it is not a card, it is a system.” When the REAL ID was debated, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said that he was not comfortable with the privacy implications because this is a national ID.
REAL ID is a form of outsider control, an usurpation of state rights, “he who holds the data, makes the rules.”
The REAL ID law of 2005 has three stated purposes, to access federal buildings, to board domestic flights, and to enter nuclear facilities. However, the language of the law says, “and any other purposes that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall determine.”
What if the current or future Homeland Security Secretary decides that you “need REAL ID to access health care, get married, get a hotel room, open a bank account, or buy a gun or ammunition?” And the Secretary does not need to ask permission from Congress to expand the Homeland Security’s roles, according to a 2008 rule. In the future, biometrics can be required such as facial profile and DNA.