Dr. Tim Ball Responds To Gore Video

Bob: My comments on the Gore clip. It is a classic example of the big lie. Adolf Hitler defined this in Mein Kampf as so big that people simply wouldn’t believe anyone, “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”

In Chapter VI he wrote, “But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and most important requirement for success.”

In this short clip Gore repeats most of the falsehoods from his movie “An Inconvenient Truth.” What’s amazing is he does this even though many other groups have identified the errors. For example, among scientists Lord Christopher Monckton identified 35 major errors. Even his fellow IPCC members dramatically disagreed with the most threatening part of the movie and this clip, namely a forecast sea level rise of 4 to 12 meters. A United Kingdom Court judge wrote, “I viewed the film at the parties’ request. Although I can only express an opinion as a viewer rather than as a judge, it is plainly, as witnessed by the fact that it received an Oscar this year for best documentary film a powerful, dramatically presented and highly professionally produced film. It is built round the charismatic presence of the ex-Vice-President, Al Gore, whose crusade it now is to persuade the world of the dangers of climate change caused by global warming. It is now common ground that it is not simply a science film – although it is clear that it is based substantially on scientific research search and opinion – but that it is a political film, albeit of course not party political. Its them theme is not m e merely the rely fact that there is global warm warming, and that there is a powerful case that such global warming is caused by man, but that urgent, and if necessary expensive and inconvenient, steps must be taken to counter it, many of which are spelt out. Paul Downes, using persuasive force almost equivalent to that of Mr Gore, has established his case that the views in the film are political by submitting that Mr Gore promotes an apocalyptic vision, which would be used to influence a vast array of political policies.”

The court ordered the Brtiish government to provide manuals for teachers planning to show the movie in the classroom advising the students of the political nature and the errors. Gore fails to correct the errors identified. He also fails to acknowledge the information now available of the degree to which some scientists are complicit in perpetuating the big lie. The destruction of the hockey stick is now completely confirmed here. He cites a global temperature rise of close to 1°C since pre-industrial times but fails to note the author of that number refuses to disclose how it was determined. The final collapse of the hockey stick occurred when its authors were finally forced to disclose the data and method. There is little doubt the claimed temperature increase will suffer the same fate once the data and method are finally disclosed. He ignores the fact the global temperature declines while CO2 levels increase in complete contradiction to IPCC assumptions theory. He also ignores the continued failed predictions of the IPCC yet their work is the sole basis for his claims of continued warming and sea level rise. The big lie continues and as Hitler predicted it is being very effective. Meanwhile economies are being destroyed as disastrous policies such as cap and trade are planned.

Support Canada Free Press

VIEW Comments