Fewer regulations and loosening foreign ownership restrictions in telecoms and broadcasting would improve services and lower prices for Canadians

Promoting Efficient Competition in Canadian Telecommunications and Broadcasting


VANCOUVERLoosening restrictions on foreign investment and removing regulations that constrain how firms can compete in Canadian telecommunications and broadcasting industries would benefit Canadians through increased service offerings, improved product quality, and lower prices, finds a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank.


“Telecommunications and broadcasting are both vitally important to the economic health of a nation, and yet in Canada, both suffer from inefficient competition, which means Canadians suffer through more limited service offerings and high prices,” said Steven Globerman, Fraser Institute senior fellow and author of Promoting Efficient Competition in Canadian Telecommunications and Broadcasting.

The study finds that opening up telecommunications and broadcasting in Canada to increased and less regulated competition, including from foreign investors (except in cases where national security might be compromised), would promote more consumer-focused content, more choice and lower costs for Canadians over time.

Specifically, in telecommunications, competition has been tightly managed by successive governments and focused on establishing a fourth national carrier to compete with the major incumbents: Bell Canada, Rogers, and Telus.

Consequently, investment and innovation has been discouraged and prices have been higher than they otherwise would be. However, given the emergence of a fourth national carrier, the justification for regulated competition no longer holds.

Public policy in broadcasting has primarily focused on subsidizing the production and distribution of Canadian content. Incumbent broadcasters are the conduit, directly or indirectly, for the relevant subsidies, which, in turn, are largely passed through to consumers. This means Canadians pay a higher price for streaming services and other broadcasting services.

“Public policy in both the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors has been directed at objectives other than promoting efficient competition, and the result has been less innovation, more limited choice of products and services and higher prices for Canadians,” Globerman said.

Media Contact:
Steven Globerman, Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute

To arrange media interviews or for more information, please contact:
Drue MacPherson, Fraser Institute
604-688-0221 ext. 721
drue.macpherson@fraserinstitute.org


View Comments

Fraser Institute——

The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian public policy research and educational organization with offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Montreal and ties to a global network of 86 think-tanks. Its mission is to measure, study, and communicate the impact of competitive markets and government intervention on the welfare of individuals. To protect the Institute’s independence, it does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research. Visit fraserinstitute.org.

Follow the Fraser Institute on Twitter | Like us on Facebook