CRU Climategate Scandal, Huckstering snake-oil salesmen and 'global warming' profiteers

Greens to be Held to Account?

By Barry Napier—— Bio and Archives--November 25, 2009

Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

I’m glad to say that the hacking into the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University is now hitting hard, and an inquiry is being demanded on both sides of the Atlantic, even though an ordinary Google search for ‘environmentalism’ doesn’t throw up anything on the matter. But, the media are responding!


The Guardian (London), 24th Nov., said

“It’s no use pretending this isn’t a major blow. The emails… could scarcely be more damaging. I am now convinced they are genuine… Yes, the messages were obtained illegally… But there are some messages that require no spin to make them look bad… I believe the head of the unit, Phil Jones, should now resign.”

Yes, the emails are genuine. Jones admitted to that, as I proved in my last article on the hacking. And yes, this should be a major blow to the greenie cause. That is why we must keep up the pressure. Not only should Jones be sacked, but he should be forced to account for every penny of his ill-gained funding, which was obtained by fraudulent claims. Already, some are looking at the possibility of charges being brought for fraud. Let us hope it happens. Then, we can all trace the deception backwards, all the way to Al Gore.

A scientist who was frequently mistreated by Jones in his discussions with others, is Hans Von Storch. He said, in 22nd Nov.,

“A conclusion could be that the principle, according to which data must be made public, so that adversaries may check the analysis, must be really enforced. Another conclusion could be that scientists like Mike Mann, Phil Jones and others, should no longer participate in the peer-review process or in assessment activities like IPCC.”

Both conclusions must be adhered to! Normally, scientists do not need to publish their work until they are finished. But, where what they say has drastic ramifications for the whole world, and affects every citizen, whether or not they want to be affected, there must be public openness about every stage of research. If all it meant was that scientists bickered amongst themselves, I would not care less, though I might argue for scientific integrity.

When, however, my taxes, energy, freedom of speech, etc., are all affected, I want to know what is going on BEFORE conclusions are arrived at. Thus far, Jones and his badly-behaved friends have held the world to ransom. It must now stop, and those who fund them must also be investigated. Even the gullible must, surely, agree to that.

Lord Lawson has also demanded an inquiry (Daily Mail, 24th Nov), calling the emails hacked from the CRU, a “scandal”. He adds that the credibility and integrity of British science is now at stake. No—only that of climate liars. Most other scientists are genuine and carry on their work without the massive injection of funding that Jones commanded. Even so, all science must now take stock and ensure that their disciplines are held to account and are not manipulated for personal gain and to the detriment of science overall.

To me, this incredible fiasco is debilitating, not enhancing. To insist that a continuous pack of lies is equal to genuine science is lower than low; it is like cheating at exams. No real scientist can possibly allow lies to masquerade as truth. But, as Jones delightedly said to another liar, he was in it for the money, because he is “selfish”.

The emails were originally posted on a Russian website and have since spread around the world. And rightly so. It has been claimed that some of the emails have been tampered with. But, only those who sent or received them can verify that—and many of these people have lied to the public and to the IPCC anyway, so why believe them?

It is also true that Russia still has an anti-West attitude, and it is in their interest to blow things up to portray scientists in a bad light. But, who cares? If the emails and documents are genuine, I do not care if they were hacked by anti-West Russians. What matters is that these deceptive pseudo-scientists are stopped dead in their tracks, before they do us even more damage.

The US is also starting an investigation—no doubt to the dismay of Obama, who must see this as a personal body-blow… I hope. They are concentrating on emails from or to White House Science Adviser John Holdren, especially as some emails concerned Michael Mann, a major deceiver. Let’s hope he, too, is kicked out of his post… although we will probably get another emotional and intellectual cripple in his place, to fit the current White House ethos of stupidity and deception. The investigation is, at last, also probing the IPCC reports, because the IPCC excluded reports that opposed their view.

Let Heads Roll!
I sincerely hope that all scientists who are part of the environmental charade lose their positions if they do not admit to fiddling the books and ‘turn states’ evidence’. In my own work, if I had once hidden or manipulated figures I would have been summarily dismissed! So, why should these outright liars retain their jobs and status? I am hopeful that this will reach a satisfactory conclusion, because Obama and others are set to ruin us all with false data, for their own ends, just as fake scientists have deceived the world just to gain money and distinctions.

Lord Monckton calls the caught-out scientists “criminals”. Like me, he is furious about the emails and documents and says that everyone must now kick up a fuss.

Like me, he is furious because, as we all know, climate change laws and taxes are directly based on what these liars say, and it is their unsubstantiated words (because they refused to allow genuine scientists to look at the data) that have led to the demand for a new world government at Copenhagen. As I have shown in my articles and in my books, the true aim is not to do with ‘saving the planet’, but with global taxation by the UN, loss of freedoms, and financial restraints… Monckton says the same things.

Calling them “arrogant fraudsters”, he says we now know why they have consistently refused to show their data to other scientists. He quotes from one long document that says the figures were a “hopeless, tangled mess”. But, of course, they were cleaned up and presented as a cogent whole, ‘proving’ warming was still going on! “In effect” says Monckton, “The global temperature trends have simply been made up”

He adds that “Unfortunately, the British researchers have been acting closely in league with their US counterparts, who compile the other terrestrial temperature dataset… the dataset, too, contains numerous biases intended to inflate the natural warming of the 20th century.”

Monckton continues:

“Finally, these huckstering snake-oil salesmen and ‘global warming’ profiteers - for that is what they are—have written to each other encouraging the destruction of data that had been lawfully requested under the Freedom of Information Act in the UK, by scientists who wanted to check whether their global temperature record had been properly compiled. And that procurement of data destruction, as they are about to find out to their cost, is a criminal offense. They are not merely bad scientists—they are crooks. And crooks who have perpetrated their crimes at the expense of British and US taxpayers.”

Finally, he says what I have already said:

“I am angry, and so should you be”!
Monckton, together with real scientist, Fred Singer, has reported the criminals to the UK’s Information Commissioner, requesting an investigation by him and his department, and a prosecution if that is appropriate.
“But, I’m not holding my breath: in the police state that Britain has sadly become, with supine news media largely owned and controlled by the government, the establishment tends to look after its own. At our expense, and at the expense of the truth.” (Pajamasmedia.com)
As I keep asking—what will YOU do about it? Let it go and things will get far, far worse. Even if we can only rattle the cages, it will show governments that we will no longer allow liars and frauds to strip us of truth and money, whether it is scientists or Obama. Go on—do it… it is wonderfully refreshing and you might actually get somewhere!Barry Napier runs christiandoctrine.com. The Global Green Agenda’, Barry Napier. Published, Petra Press, 2009. For other anti-green books by Barry Napier contact the author: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)


Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Guest Column Barry Napier -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Items of notes and interest from the web.

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence and death, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: