Hillary Clinton's security lapse

Classified material


Isn't it a slap in the face of the American people to allow Hillary Clinton to continue her presidential campaign in light of the absolute proof that she knew the use of a private server was not allowed? How do we know this? Because the people directly under her, and managed by her, were not allowed to use private servers.

Mrs. Clinton has used the weak and childish argument that "everybody does it". In fact, no, they do not. The use of a private server in her home is a practice exclusively exercised by HRC. There are three things that make this story critical. One, the disposition of it will set a precedent about the future use of private emails and government business. Two, we have a right to know (before election day) if a presidential, or for that matter, any candidate participates in illegal activities. Three, the very fact that Ms. Clinton felt entitled to her own set of rules speaks to her arrogance. It doesn't seem like too much to ask that sensitive and classified material be treated with the utmost security. Arnold Avery Englewood, FL

View Comments

Guest Column——

Items of notes and interest from the web.