By Judi McLeod ——Bio and Archives--April 2, 2023
Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Devious mainstream and social media are having us on in their propaganda claims that the “world’s greatest minds” are in an epic tug of war on where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is taking humanity.
According to media reports, two of the “world’s greatest minds”, billionaires Elon Musk and Bill Gates, are now on opposite ends of the AI fight.
Musk and Gates two of the “world’s greatest minds”?
God help us!
Musk and Gates are—like most globalist elite oligarchs—all in the same boat—hellbent-headed for the same destination.
World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab has brought globalist elite oligarchs on the run for control of Artificial Intelligence in what could easily be called ‘Gold Rush 2023’.
You don’t have to put your ear down to the ground to hear the sound of their pounding feet, running at break-neck speed.
For the supremely coveted AI, it all comes down to owning and controlling the world—a new world with no America.
Weeks before the infighting story broke, Fox News host Laura Ingraham brought up an ominous remark from Klaus Schwab, in which he said that in the future, whoever owns artificial intelligence will “own the world.” Schwab thinks this revolution of the world order, brought about in large part by advances in AI, is just a decade away at most.” (Evolution News, March 3, 2023)
Owning the world has been the pipe dream of the Davos crazies for a long time.
Pronouns of the globalist elite oligarchs: “WE”, as in “WE own the world”, and for world citizens who they promise will own nothing and be happy—“THEM”.
“We own the world WEF’ers are now out there, supposedly “building better”, building better meaning building a brave new world without the inclusion of the United States of America, which they must totally ‘disappear’ to own and control the world.
Don’t be fooled by the so-called internecine fighting of the globalist elite oligarchs:
“Silicon Valley is in the midst of a civil war over the advancement of artificial intelligence - with the world's greatest minds split over whether it will destroy or elevate humanity. (Daily Mail, March 30, 2023)
“The growing divide comes after the extraordinary rise of ChatGPT, which has taken the world by storm in recent months, passing leading medical and law exams that take humans nearly three months to prepare.
"Elon Musk, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak and the late Stephen Hawking are among the most famous critics of AI who believe the technology poses a 'profound risk to society and humanity' and could have 'catastrophic' effects.
“The tech tycoons on Wednesday called for a pause on the 'dangerous race' to advance AI, saying more risk assessment needs to be conducted before humans lose control and it becomes a sentient human-hating species.
“At this point, AI would have reached singularity, which means it has surpassed human intelligence and has independent thinking.
“AI would no longer need or listen to humans, allowing it to steal nuclear codes, create pandemics and spark world wars.
"DeepAI founder Kevin Baragona, who signed the letter, told DailyMail.com: 'It's almost akin to a war between chimps and humans.
“The humans obviously win since we're far smarter and can leverage more advanced technology to defeat them.
'If we're like the chimps, then the AI will destroy us, or we'll become enslaved to it.'
“However, Bill Gates, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and futurist Ray Kurzweil are on the other side of the aisle.
“They are hailing ChatGPT-like AI as our time's 'most important' innovation - saying it could solve climate change, cure cancer and enhance productivity.
Support Canada Free Press
“Many have questioned whether a personal vendetta between Musk and Gates, who have argued over climate change and the COVID pandemic, is part of the rift in Silicon Valley. But Musk has been warning about the dangers of AI for years.” (Daily Mail)
That being the case, Mr. Musk, don’t just pause it, STOP it!
“OpenAI launched ChatGPT in November, which became an instant success worldwide.(Daily Mail)
“The chatbot is a large language model trained on massive text data, allowing it to generate eerily human-like text in response to a given prompt.
“The public uses ChatGPT to write research papers, books, news articles, emails and other text-based work and while many see it more like a virtual assistant, many brilliant minds see it as the end of humanity.”
“Many brilliant minds see it as the end of humanity” but are doing diddly-squat to stop it?
What’s “brilliant-minded” about THAT?
“In 1970 Marvin Minsky told Life Magazine, 'from three to eight years, we will have a machine with the general intelligence of an average human being.' (Daily Mail)
“And while the timing of the prediction was off, the idea of AI having human intelligence is not.”
A prediction straight out of the writings of Science Fiction!
“ChatGPT is evidence of how fast the technology is growing. (Daily Mail)
“In just a few months, it has passed the bar exam with a higher score than 90 percent of humans who have taken it, and it achieved 60 percent accuracy on the US Medical Licensing Exam.
'Large language models as they exist today are already a revolution enough to power ten years of monumental growth, even with no further technology advances. They're already incredibly disruptive, Baragona told DailyMail.com.
'To state that we need more technological advances right now is irresponsible and could lead to devastating economic and quality of life consequences.'
“Hollywood may have sparked humans' fears of AI which were typically shown as evil, such as in The Matrix and The Terminator, painting a picture of robot overlords enslaving the human race.(Daily Mail)
“However, the idea is echoed throughout Silicon Valley as more than 1,000 tech experts believe it could become our reality.
"This would be possible if AI reaches singularity, a hypothetical future where technology surpasses human intelligence and changes the path of our evolution - and this is predicted to happen by 2045. AI would first have to pass the Turing Test.
"When it does, the technology is considered to have independent intelligence, allowing it to self-replicate into an even more powerful system that humans cannot control.
"Meta's Facebook also shut down a controversial chatbot experiment in 2017 that saw two AIs develop their own language to communicate.
“Some speculate Musk and Wozniak oppose the technology because they are not leading the charge.”
Who cares about who is leading the charge?
“Musk founded OpenAI with Sam Altman, the company's CEO, but in 2018 the billionaire attempted to take control of the startup. (Daily Mail)
“His request was rejected, forcing him to quit OpenAI and move on with his other projects.
“Musk has recently slammed ChatGPT as 'woke' and deviating from OpenAI's original non-profit mission.
But what in the greed dominated world of our day is genuinely “non-profit”?
'OpenAI was created as an open source (which is why I named it 'Open' AI), non-profit company to serve as a counterweight to Google, but now it has become a closed source, maximum-profit company effectively controlled by Microsoft, Musk tweeted in February.
“Wozniak is currently the chief scientist at Primary Data, which is developing data virtualization solutions that transform data center architectures by matching data demands with storage supply across a single global dataspace.
“And his distaste for AI could be that it can potentially replace the company.(Daily Mail)
"However, not everyone who has opposed the technology would lose out on its advancement - the late Hawking also sounded the alarm back in 2014.(Daily Mail)
"Speaking to BBC, Hawking said: 'The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.
'It would take off on its own and re-design itself at an ever-increasing rate.'
“The late scientist signed an open letter in 2015, along with Musk, promising to ensure AI research benefits humanity.
'The potential benefits are huge, since everything that civilization has to offer is a product of human intelligence; we cannot predict what we might achieve when this intelligence is magnified by the tools AI may provide, but the eradication of disease and poverty are not unfathomable,' the authors wrote.
“In the long term, it could have the potential to play out like a fictional dystopia in which intelligence greater than humans could begin acting against their programming.
'Our AI systems must do what we want them to do,' the letter said, which is the fear that led to Wednesday's letter.
“The letter also warned that research into AI's rewards had to be matched equally to avoid the potential damage it could wreak.
“For instance, in the short term, it claims AI may put millions of people out of work.”
Didn’t world government over reaction to the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ already do that?
“The AI civil war reached the tipping point on Wednesday when an open letter was sent by 1,000 experts, including scientists like John Hopfield from Princeton University and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. (Daily Mail)
“Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable,' the letter said.
“The letter also detailed potential risks to society and civilization by human-competitive AI systems in the form of economic and political disruptions and called on developers to work with policymakers on governance and
Meanwhile, the biggest argument about Artificial Intelligence and Schwab’s ‘Gold Rush 2023’ couldn’t possibly be more simple.
God Almighty created humans. Greedy, power-crazed globalists created AI, which is nothing more than man-made machines. Nothing human or God-like about them.
View Comments