Liberal guilt leaves Democrats helpless to deal with destruction

I finally realized that the Democrat government officials who are currently allowing the destruction of their cities to continue unabated are responding out of their typical flawed liberal guilt approach to things: avoid even the false accusations of racism (or whatever the issue of the moment) by giving into whatever those making accusations demand. The fact that it is a flawed tactic becomes painfully clear when the demand became one of tear everything down, figuratively and literally! In other words, it’s as if those making the demands are saying: You must self-destruct or you’re a racist. Try and stop us and you’re even more of a racist. Stopping us is racist, therefore all law enforcement is racist. And anyone else who defends themselves or criticizes our violence is racist and should be arrested for it (see the case of the St. Louis Self-Defenders).

Then Barack Hussein Obama was elected President, and it became “racist” to oppose any doctrine and policy decisions of the man

I’ve been falsely accused of racism by political opponents several times over the years, but when a Black man became the Democrat presidential candidate and then became President, it established the false racism accusation strategy at a much higher level in the United States, and put a large bullseye on the back of all of us who openly opposed them. My long-standing opposition to socialism (defined as a centralized government run by a bureaucracy of Leftist ideologues that overrides citizen-participatory government) became racist to some Democrats because a Black presidential candidate was espousing it, and I wasn’t bowing in acquiescence to the above-described liberal guilt. Then Barack Hussein Obama was elected President, and it became “racist” to oppose any doctrine and policy decisions of the man, as well as anything by the political party he belonged to. When the 2016 election came along, then, Democrats made it out to be a matter of vote Democrat or vote racist, and proceeded to falsely make the Republican candidate, whoever he was going to be, into the biggest racist in history. After Donald John Trump was elected, the Left was split into two irreconcilable parts, the radical Leftists and Centrist Democrats. Then, true to the Left’s ideology of dialectics, the thesis, the old Democrat establishment, was eviscerated and the antithesis, Leftism, took over, becoming the new synthesis, dictatorially ruling over the old-guard Democrats.

---

The glaring error in their strategy

That brings us to the 2020 presidential election. Since the President has become, in the Democrat’s false propaganda reality, Concentrated Evil Racism, that means the Democrats see themselves as the antithesis of racism and therefore the force of Dialectical Manifest Destiny, that must dictatorially and, as we are now seeing, violently, destroy everything connected with the thesis, the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America and everything connected with its great heritage. The Lie is now being spread by major media that this Leftist takeover of America is inevitable and is so certain that even a candidate with dementia, who would be unable to carry out the duties of a President if elected, can handily beat Donald John Trump. The glaring error in their strategy, however, is that the American people are not simply a thesis waiting to be overthrown by an “inevitable” antithesis, but will, to the extent the Left succeeds, cause an equal and even greater avalanche of opposition to this destruction of our nation and will sweep them off the City Upon a Hill into a dead-end ravine. We can do it, America!