WhatFinger

Arm-twisting and closed-door meetings used to pass the redefinition of marriage

New York’s Highest Court Asked to Review Marriage Vote and Open Meeting Violations



Albany, NY – Today, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, was asked to review a challenge to the New York legislature’s vote regarding the redefinition of marriage to include people of the same gender. Liberty Counsel filed suit in the New York Supreme Court (the trial court) against the law, which was signed into law on June 24, 2011, by Gov. Cuomo. The state asked the court to dismiss the case, but Judge Wiggins sided with Liberty Counsel on the Open Meetings complaint, ruling that the case may proceed to trial. Liberty Counsel represents New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and several other plaintiffs. An appellate court reversed the ruling, and now the state’s highest court has been asked to review the matter.

New York law requires that a bill be printed and in its final form on the desks of the legislators three days prior to a vote, unless an emergency exists. Gov. Cuomo ignored the provision and declared an emergency, stating that waiting three days would deprive same-sex couples of marriage. Trial court Judge Wiggins wrote: “Logically and clearly this cite by the Governor is disingenuous. The review of such concept altering legislation for three days after generations of existing definitions would not so damage same-sex couples as to necessitate an avoidance of rules meant to ensure full review and discussion prior to any vote.” The judge wrote that “although the disregard for the statute seems evident, the Court feels constrained to not rule on the Governor’s certification of necessity.” However, on the Open Meetings complaint, Judge Wiggins wrote that “clear arm-twisting by the Executive on the Legislative permeates this entire process.” The court noted that New York law requires every meeting of a public body to “be open to the general public,” with few exceptions, none of which apply here. On this significant aspect of the complaint, the court allowed the case to proceed to trial, but the appellate court reversed that ruling earlier this year. Liberty Counsel is now pursuing review before the Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court of review. The remedy sought is the voiding of the law. Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, commented: “New York law requires that meetings of the legislature be open to the public. The arm-twisting and closed-door meetings used to pass this law redefining marriage violated the open meetings requirements. The legislative process must be transparent, not shrouded in mystery where the people have no opportunity for input. When government operates in secret and freezes out the very people it is supposed to represent, the entire system fails. The law should be set aside, and the process should begin again to allow the people a voice in the process.”

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Liberty Counsel——

Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989, by providing pro bono assistance and representation on these and related topics.


Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->