WhatFinger

Canada’s Indo-Pacific Trade Strategy and Trade Diversification

Ottawa’s misguided Indo-Pacific trade strategy unlikely to succeed


By Fraser Institute ——--October 24, 2023

Canadian News, Politics | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


VANCOUVER—The federal government’s new Indo-Pacific trade strategy (IPS), meant to encourage increased Canadian exports to Indo-Pacific countries such as India and China through subsidies and other preferential treatments, unwisely shifts attention from Canada’s largest trading partner and key source of prosperity, finds a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan, Canadian public policy think-tank.

“Despite many emerging markets in Asia, the United States remains Canada’s main market for exports, dwarfing all other markets,” said Steven Globerman, senior fellow at the Fraser Institute and author of Canada’s Indo-Pacific Trade Strategy and Trade Diversification.

Increasing Canada’s integration to supply chains in Asia is a very difficult task, particularly compared to the existing integration of Canadian and U.S. markets

For example, from 2017 to 2020, approximately 75 per cent of Canada’s merchandise exports (e.g. machinery, agricultural products) went to the U.S market compared to less than 5 per cent to China.

Why? Mainly geography—the bulk of international trade in goods is conducted primarily within regions (e.g. North America) and such trade is actually becoming even more prominent post-COVID as companies seek to consolidate their supply chains.

“The massive disruption in the ability of global companies to produce and sell goods during and after COVID has incentivized them to consolidate their operations in smaller geographic regions,” Globerman said.

Moreover, differences in language, legal and regulatory institutions, and business practises create informal trade barriers between countries. Increasing Canada’s integration to supply chains in Asia is a very difficult task, particularly compared to the existing integration of Canadian and U.S. markets based on common culture and institutions.

“It’s not clear that China or India would be open to, let alone welcoming of, deeper integration in Asian supply chains by Canada,” Globerman said.


Canada’s trade relationship with U.S. is a major contributing factor to the prosperity and well-being of Canadians

Finally, as Canada focuses on the Asia-Pacific, it’s missing enormous opportunities to deepen and improve trade relations with the U.S. including in the burgeoning area of trade in digital services, which are currently not well covered by existing trade agreements.

“Canada’s trade relationship with U.S. is a major contributing factor to the prosperity and well-being of Canadians, and policymakers in Ottawa should not lose sight of that fact,” Globerman said.

Media Contact:
Steven Globerman, Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute

To arrange media interviews or for more information, please contact:
Mark Hasiuk, Fraser Institute
604-688-0221 ext. 517
mark.hasiuk@fraserinstitute.org


Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Fraser Institute——

The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian public policy research and educational organization with offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Montreal and ties to a global network of 86 think-tanks. Its mission is to measure, study, and communicate the impact of competitive markets and government intervention on the welfare of individuals. To protect the Institute’s independence, it does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research. Visit fraserinstitute.org.

Follow the Fraser Institute on Twitter | Like us on Facebook


Sponsored