So here is the rub: Manitoba generates 97 per cent of its power through dependable hydroelectricity and the remaining three per cent comes from the province’s last natural gas-fuelled station in Brandon. Natural gas is the least carbon emitting fossil fuel, yet the province is obsessed with phasing it out. It makes no sense.
Manitoba could invest in more natural gas plants and examine all dispatchable energy sources. These are cheap, plentiful, and scalable technologies available 24/7, such as oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear. Large hydro projects with reservoirs are dispatchable, but even hydro is vulnerable to droughts.
Manitoba could fortify its grid with dispatchable sources to supplement its reliable and abundant hydroelectricity. We can use wind and solar in small-scale supplemental ways, but they cannot be relied upon.
Here is Manitoba’s dangerous gamble: Facing the prospect of having to double or even triple Manitoba’s electricity capacity, the province plans to add this new capacity with wind power and other “green” sources.
Again, there is nothing inherently wrong with wind power; it is just not a reliable source and is very costly to integrate into the grid. If we look at jurisdictions like Germany, Texas, and California that rely too much on intermittent renewables – including wind – we see their experiences with skyrocketing electricity rates, blackouts and economic havoc.
The Manitoba Metis Federation is playing into this dangerous gamble by offering to build wind power capacity without cost projections.
Manitoba must reverse course and make reliability and affordability its electricity priority. The alternative means repeating the mistakes of other jurisdictions and gambling on Manitoba’s future.
Joseph Quesnel is a senior research fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.