For all the talk about making America great again, you cannot restore the foundations of this country if there is no respect for the natural family
The pro-life movement has rendered an estimable service to this country, fighting to normalize the right of unborn children to live. When Roe was first imposed on the country, the science behind unborn life in the woman was so scant, that a number of Republicans and Democrats were “pro-choice.” The Christian Coalition made life a signature issue for the GOP, and the science and research have caught up with Biblical revelation. Even black activists, atheists, and progressives have become staunchly pro-life, despite their other liberal leanings. It’s time for a similar coalition, working with other faiths and conservative constitutionalists, to fight for the restoration of natural marriage.
For all the talk about making America great again, you cannot restore the foundations of this country if there is no respect for the natural family. Great countries require strong families, for there is no other institution better equipped to enable the growth of the population and the stability of civilization at the same time. Nationalists and populists within the GOP love Hungary’s Viktor Orban. Too bad they are not bringing some of their love of his pro-family policies to America. CPAC celebrated Orban in 2021, but also feted the LGBT-friendly organizations undermining traditional family mores. The American First Congressional caucus has talked big about keeping men out of women’s sports. But where’s the activism to ensure every child has a Mom and a Dad? You can’t be America First if you treat American Children Second. Families matter, parents matter, but our current political elite has deemed that neither matter. Societal chaos becomes the norm. This dissolution is not something we should tolerate.
What is to be done? Repeal Obergefell, for starters. Do we have a court that will repeal Obergefell? Not yet. Justice Gorsuch has disappointed conservatives with some of his more libertarian and even progressive rulings, including Clayton v. Bostock. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that Chief Justice Roberts would stick to his prior ruling in Obergefell (he did dissent in that decision, after all), and not cave to protecting precedent at all costs.
So far, there are four justices who are presumably on our side. With this calculation in mind, opponents of the destruction of marriage should hold off on challenging that egregious decision until President Trump (or Desantis, or whomever is not a Democrat) appoints another justice to replace one of the three liberals. In the meantime, the fight to win hearts and minds for family and against LGBT lies must occupy us, just as much as ending abortion.