WhatFinger

Mike Huckabee

Second String Republicans



One thing this elongated campaign season, thus far, has revealed is that almost all of the candidates are a bunch of second stringers. What separates them from the first string is maturity. Mature candidates don’t fall into the same old traps and don’t make the same mistakes made before.

We're seeing a lot of this right now. The prospect of facing an honesty/likability challenged Hillary, or an inexperienced Obama should have our perspective Republican candidates salivating. However they are mired in the tried-and-true minutia, responding to a media that has already chosen sides, and some of us have real doubts that any of them are truly ready for The Show. Mike Huckabee's latest salvo against President Bush shows his lack of maturity. First of all, a freebie to Mike: President Bush isn’t on the ballot. Let it go. Bashing Bush may make for premium media attention, as most bash him privately when they’re not doing so either in print or on television. But the very issues Mike Huckabee is criticizing are the exact positions he’ll be taking when going up against a potential Pelosi-led congress. Just because Mike’s last name isn’t Bush, doesn’t mean she’ll ease up off the brother. Also, Huckabee’s comment on religion and Mitt Romney’s “well received” speech on the subject is also playing into the liberal bear trap. Why? Besides the “negative attacks” hurled at Obama by Clinton operatives, how many questions have Democrat candidates had to answer in debates on religion? Google "democrats religion" and you won't find any kind of faith-based answer by a Democrat. They have none, thus it's a media manufactured issue. In fact, next time you get a chance to look at some debate highlights, compare the questions asked to one party vice the other. Democrats are asked questions on domestic issues they "champion", while Republicans are made to answer for issues the media deem irritating; unpopular questions about the “faltering” economy, religion, abortion, and the war. Questions designed to put our candidates on the defensive. Mitt Romney gave his religion speech in front of a handpicked audience. It was supposedly a speech he didn’t want to deliver. His religion was made an issue primarily by the secular progressives who seem more intimidated by Mormons than radical Muslims. By making that speech, he acknowledged his religion as one that needed addressing. Does anyone care about Hillary’s religious views? No, because it isn’t important. Republicans, like clockwork, get caught up in the family values recitation that sets us up as hypocrites because of Mark Foleys and Larry Craigs. No Democrat candidate has been asked to seriously address the Congressional Page scandal under their watch, because Democrats don’t run on values. They can’t. Most of the time, they have none, thus they get the media pass. Maybe we can, but I’d just wish one Republican would show guts and ask a debate moderator or campaign beat reporter if that same question was asked of a Democrat. If “yes”, answer it. If “no”, let them ask a Democrat first. But Mike Huckabee has fallen face first in the media's attempt to maintain our dwindling interest, thus it was a dumb move on his part. It shows a lack of vision and discipline. You Republicans are running FOR President of the United States. You're not running against a particular Democrat or liberal policy. You're not running for or against the war. In fact, you're not running for any topic driven by a media that is our enemy. And you're NOT RUNNING AGAINST PRESIDENT BUSH! That should be obvious. As it's not to Mike Huckabee, his electability should be questioned. I’m waiting for a presidential candidate to emerge. I’m waiting for someone who acts like he really wants to be president, and isn't just doing this to get out of the house. I’m waiting for someone who’s not a Howard Dean media-creation train wreck waiting to crash. I’m waiting for someone who’s not sucking up to the media because he thinks they like him. I’m waiting for someone who’s not running on policies that have weakened the ability of future candidates to compete. I’m waiting for candidates who’ve actually read some of the Constitution. I’m still waiting.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Bob Parks——

Bob Parks is a is a member/writer of the National Advisory Council of Project 21. Bob’s websites are Black & Right and youtube.com/BlackAndRight


Sponsored