Shortsighted gov’ts block sun for solar farms; AI granted autonomous grid

The flip-flopping of eco-crazes over the last 60 years from prophesying ice ages to global warming, back to cooling and, finally, global “boiling,” there has been anxiety instilled among school-age children on their trek to adulthood. The constant swing from one life-threatening climate crisis to another did one thing--it embedded a panic mindset among the indoctrinated youth.

Governments have been using geoengineering to block the sun

First, it was build, use, and depend on “renewables” to save the planet from CO2, and to convince the gullible to level and cover hundreds of square miles of land, much of it arable, with solar panels and wind turbines. Then the propaganda switched to ‘the planet has too much sunlight’ which is creating deadly heat. Global warming is back in vogue, although not according to actual temperature measurements and analyses.

The redirection occurred (by design?) after countries had swallowed the bait and built solar farms and banks that are only 42% efficient in supplying power, gutting availability of energy for everyday needs.

Then comes the realization that governments have been using geoengineering to block the sun. April 29, 2025, the lesson was driven home when the Iberian peninsula (that’s Spain and Portugal for the geography challenged) went dark for over 12 hours likely because of, you guessed it, cloud cover (Dave Walsh analysis at 24:00), i.e. lack of sunlight. Hence, the hit-or-miss solar farms couldn’t produce enough power and a blackout occurred where these two countries boast an 80% reliance on “renewables.”

The Iberian power failure happened promptly after Bill Gates hornswoggled Britain, and possibly other entities, into injecting sulfur dioxide and other nanoparticles in the atmosphere to reflect sunlight away from the earth in order to “save” it.

Does anyone see the correlation amid this gloomy outlook? (pun intended) It may be worthwhile to examine the intent of Gates and his climate manipulating cohorts.

The previous administration’s Inflation Reduction Act subsidies are funding sunlight-blocking weather manipulation

The general public has been maneuvered into erecting vast solar farms to generate power, which isn’t sufficient to sustain an industrial economy, let alone running refrigerators or cell towers. Knowing that to be the case, government agencies have been subverted to implement operations that are meant to block sunlight from reaching the earth, because the current propaganda is that it needs cooling.

What comes next is solar farms not receiving enough sunlight to power the grid even marginally, resulting in blackouts like Spain experienced days ago. Thus, green plants and trees--our great forests and oceans--no longer have adequate sunlight to convert CO2 into life-sustaining oxygen via photosynthesis.

So what’s the plan? Because here’s the other question…

The previous administration’s Inflation Reduction Act subsidies are funding sunlight-blocking weather manipulation and, conversely, building vast solar instalments. In the midst of straightening out the Biden administration’s mayhem, artificial intelligence (AI) developers are receiving the go-ahead to build their own power plants to guarantee the massive power necessary to operate their server farms.

Follow the thoughts on where that could lead. AI developers independently generate all the power they need to change the face of factories from relying on cheap labor that drove manufacturing overseas in the first place, to mechanization. This was explained by NVIDIA’s CEO Jensen Huang, at President Trump’s Investment in America event at the White House, April 30, 2025. Their concept of manufacturing is overtaking industry with more efficient robotics.

This kind of mechanization isn’t reliant on the CO2/oxygen cycle for food or to breathe that human, animal and plant life must have. Is it the intent of AI investors to replace biological workers with mechanization, knowing that reduction of sunlight could and probably would eventually induce suffering by all flora and fauna, and diminish their populations?

Yet, here’s another angle… could AI be a threat to just humanity (and in the previous context, to other life) or also to itself?

There are multiple issues beyond the re-industrialization dependent on AI driven mechanization. One is data collection that has been ongoing especially since the inception of the “information age.” Who is more trustworthy as owners of information gathered by AI, private businesses or government? An individual, generous but misguided in their agnosticism, or government rife with corruption, offices filled with individuals playing at Christian values in their self-centered atheism?

Going back a couple of months, those who held up signs that said ‘Musk Steals’ at President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress, only recognized interference with their stealing and cash misappropriation, not understanding or caring about the accumulation of sensitive data by AI firms. The resentment of these corrupt politicians hasn’t abated in the last 100 days of Trump’s success re-orienting government by identifying, and hopefully, slashing the fraud and waste. They are holding sit-ins, and flying in private jets around the country on “Fight Oligarchy” tours, attempting to take the focus off their lawless personal enrichment at taxpayer expense.

In the case of DOGE, the implementation of AI has shed a bright light on fund mismanagement and laundering

In the case of DOGE, the implementation of AI has shed a bright light on fund mismanagement and laundering. It’s use of information collection has been a boon to citizens’ ability to see how public funds are ill-spent, which raises the spectre of government “owning” and manipulating personal data. This is a conundrum for which an immediate solution isn’t clear.

However, the fulfillment of AI re-industrialization infers other considerations regarding manipulation of weather and, in conjunction, the false premise of “renewable” power generation. That federal, state, county, and municipal agencies have been manipulated to replace continuous base load power generation with intermittent, unreliable solar and wind farms, was a major victory for environmental posers. Following up with the moronic idea that sunlight is bad for the planet, these same earth saviors are now hell-bent on disrupting the very solar collection they championed.

It can’t be denied that they despise their own humanity and, somehow, can’t reconcile the fact that their desire to keep the earth in the dark is a suicide wish. By assisting mammoth AI plants to have their own, separate power grid is acquiescing to promoting artificial intelligence and subsequent robotics over human work forces. It feeds into the subservience and debasement of biological life to eventual purposelessness in that industry would serve itself, the mechanism, rather than humanity that funded AI, making it possible to exist.

Replacing a human work force with AI mechanization would, down the line, bring about the demise of services necessary to preserve life

Going a step further, and likely inviting scorn, replacing a human work force with AI mechanization would, down the line, bring about the demise of services necessary to preserve life. Farming, pharmaceuticals, manufacturing life-enhancing gadgets and appliances would have no purpose because robots have no need of any of the services--food, housing, commodities or consumables--that are necessary to humans.

Along the same lines, why keep schools and universities open if there’s no longer application for knowledge, there being no humans to affect or serve, and AI being self-regenerating? Neither would hospitals be needed.

Finally, even robots would become pointless having no one to serve (except themselves).

The result is Entropy.

Dictionary.com defines it as “fulfillment of social decline and degeneration.” Merriam-Webster defines it as “a process of degradation or running down or a trend to disorder.” Both definitions seem applicable to AI developers’ efforts of self-cancellation, and the purposelessness of AI in the long run.

Perhaps the foregoing looks too far downrange in assessing the circular logic epitomized by ridiculously smart individuals, who appear to be working diligently to make themselves irrelevant in an artificially intelligent world.

Either way, the outlook as envisioned by the Godless geniuses of this world can be described in only one way: dim.

Other pertinent and relevant AI articles:

AI brain-taps bypass God's thought filter, empowering evil – It's Biblical

Human and subsequent AI efforts to “create” mimic God

Here we go again… Mortal threats relegated to conspiracy status