Supporting Trump with Care and Caution

"Tyranny is always better organized than freedom." -- Charles Peguy (1873-1914) "Fear and Loathing" is a phrase made famous by the late Hunter S. Thompson, gonzo journalist extraordinaire. I recall an old "Rolling Stone" magazine article in which he endorsed Jimmy Carter for President -- with fear and loathing.

---

My support for Donald Trump has no fear in it, and certainly no loathing, but it does have its share of care and caution. In essence, my support of Trump is support for openly discussing Obama's eligibility to be POTUS. Trump is just the current standard-bearer for the cause. The fact that I support Trump should not be taken to mean that I endorse Trump. To say that I support Trump, but do not endorse him, might seem to be splitting political hairs, but it is more than verbal legerdemain. Perhaps it will help to clear up my position if I rephrase things: I support a full investigation into the eligibility of Barack Obama to be POTUS -- including, but not limited to his OCB (Official Certificate of Birth). I support Trump because he is the only one currently shining a spotlight on the topic. I am not, and have not, endorsed Trump for President. Support -- not endorse -- there IS a difference; a big one. Those of us who have watched case after case concerning Obama's eligibility to be POTUS, get dismissed by judge after judge, in court after court, can be excused for crowing over Trump's taking up the torch. After being long ignored, or mocked and ridiculed by various media pundits, it is sweet indeed to have a nationally recognized figure embrace our cause. All we want to know is, "Who is Obama -- really?" You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out that "we the people" have been sold a bogus prepackaged fabrication called "Obama's Past." I'm not talking just about Obama's birth; I mean the whole scenario surrounding Obama's personal history. Whereas Hamlet may have smelled something rotten (corrupted) in Denmark, I smell it in the US Congress, the Lame Stream Media, and all over the good old US of A. The entire eligibility issue reeks of massive cover-up, collusion, and conspiracy -- and it is a dagger aimed at the heart of the US Constitution. This article should not be mistaken as an attempt to back-peddle away from my support of Trump, because it is not. I am merely trying to clear up any misconceptions there may be surrounding my support. I have not yet endorsed Trump for President, and I don't know that I ever will -- there are too many issues from his past that leave me uneasy about both his motives and honesty. That being said, I believe that, aside from the eligibility question, Trump has made some important, valid, and powerful statements concerning America's financial situation, international posture, and moral drift. If Trump should get Rep. Allen West (R-FL) to join his ticket, I would need to give some serious thought to actually endorsing Trump for POTUS, as I consider Allen West to be probably the most "street savvy," brave, integrous, and patriotic politician currently serving in the US government. Any ticket that includes Allen West, I will have to take seriously. Link But that's down the road, at this point I cannot say whether I will endorse Trump for President, or not. For now, although I do not yet endorse Trump (and perhaps never will), I do support him enthusiastically, because he is, for the moment at least, the poster child of the eligibility issue. After Dr. Jerome Corsi's book "Where's the Birth Certificate" comes out next month, I believe that a number of other candidates (Republican and Democrat) just might jump on the "birther bandwagon," and whether to support Trump or not will become open to debate for me. In the meantime, I'll support him, for the reasons given. There's also the possibility that Corsi's book may catapult Trump way, way ahead of the pack -- only time will tell. Producer Dave Logan thinks that Trump's afterburners will kick in after "Where's the Birth Certificate" is released. Logan writes in his blog, "Corsi's book release causes all sorts of problems for progressives, the political establishment, as well as the MSM, and certain high-profile bloggers. It fills the tanks with valuable fuel for Trump to take this issue to heights unknown, and while Trump has the mic and TV cams directed at him, he'll have the opportunity to discuss what he's really expert at: economic policies, lack of jobs and how to create them, across-the-board taxation, and how the USA is being treated and disrespected around the globe under Obama's destructive leadership." File Be that as it may, "Hawaii News Now" recently interviewed Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie, and asked him to clarify what he meant when he said he was "here" when Obama was born. Did he mean the hospital room, Hawaii, earth, this galactic quadrant? File

Abercrombie: "Of course here in Hawaii." Hawaii News Now: "Not in the room?" Abercrombie: "Let's be serious. It is simply reprehensible to have this kind of conversation."

And I say it's reprehensible for "we the people" to keep having our chains yanked. File It is well to keep in mind that OBama's eligibility to be POTUS concerns a number of issues besides his place of birth -- this is not some "one trick pony" affair. There are a number of issues that have been swept under the rug, and need to be investigated. These issues include Obama violating the Logan Act, Obama's Social Security number, and he and his wife's law licenses (or lack thereof). It seems likely that Obama violated the Logan Act during his trip to Kenya as a US Senator in 2006. While in Kenya, Obama campaigned for his "cousin," radical Marxist Muslim, Raila Odinga, which one would think, might be considered an overseas activity opposed to the best interests of the United States -- i.e. a violation of the Logan Act. Nobody has ever been prosecuted for violating the 200-plus-year-old Logan Act though, so I wouldn't hold my breath on this one. The Muslim Marxist connection is worthy of noting though. File File What about the fact that both Obama and his wife have relinquished their licenses to practice law. What's up with that? Perhaps they were afraid of having them suspended -- an occurrence that most lawyers would elect not to have as part of their curriculum vitae. (Question: On the Illinois Supreme Court record of Obama's law license it says "Former Name(s): None." Was Obama not at one time named Barry Soetoro? Isn't lying on your law license application considered a crime? Just asking). File What about Obama's Connecticut issued Social Security number? Bill "The Spin Starts Here" O'Reilly recently "cleared up" the situation -- lucky us. O'Reilly informed America that while it is true that Obama was nowhere near Connecticut when he received a SS# from there, his father was, and he got it for him. Oh, okay then -- but wasn't Obama's purported father long gone from the area and in Kenya at the time? I know -- "picky, picky, picky." File File Gosh, there are just so many eligibility issues to raise concerning Obama, that one hardly knows where to start or stop. But I'll call a stop to it for now, and end this article with a brief copy/paste email message that some friends and I came up with. It concerns Obama's Hawaiian COLB (Certificate Of Live Birth), and because the good people in Congress seem to be so perplexed, puzzled, and bewildered by the issue, we made it "Super EZ Reading," so even they may understand it (we live in hope). Dear Congress Critter, Please take a look at the COLB document which has been acknowledged and released by the Obama Administration, on an Obama authorized website, as "proof" of Obama's Constitutional eligibility to be President. Do you think that the COLB as seen is valid, or invalid? As anyone who can read will notice, it is invalid -- per the bottom line of the document ("Any Alterations Invalidate This Certificate"). Please note that the ID numbers on that document have been blacked out (i.e. altered), thereby invalidating the document. It is, legally speaking, trash. Yet, this obviously invalid "document" is the one and only official document offered up by the Obama camp as proof of his eligibility to be POTUS. It has been incorrectly labeled a "birth certificate" by such luminaries as former Hawaiian Gov. Lingle, and former Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. File What is this only official "proof" of eligibility, proof of? Nothing. It is nothing but an invalid Certification of Live Birth. (There is another reputed COLB released by "Factcheck" that indeed shows ID numbers, but it is meaningless, as it has not been acknowledged as being official by anyone but "Factcheck"). If you believe that a COLB is the same as an Official Birth Certificate (OBC), permit me to point out that Hawaiian OBCs have the year of birth in their ID number as two digits, followed by 5 digits (e.g. 61-10641). Hawaiian COLBs have the year in 4 digits, with the last 5 digits preceded by a zero (e.g. 1961-010641). I would like to know if you consider Obama's Hawaiian COLB, as we see it, to be valid, or invalid -- and why. If you consider it to be valid, how is that possible? If you consider it to be invalid, then where is your proof that Obama is eligible to be POTUS? In any event, since when does a Hawaiian COLB substitute as a legal stand-in for an Official Birth Certificate? I await your response. Thank you. File Respectfully yours, Laus Deo.