'Hysterical' Michael Mann's Hockey Stick 'most discredited study in history of science'
Guest Column , Bio and Archives--February 8, 2009
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
What we did is interpolate carefully instead of just using the back of an envelope.To those of us who have been following this scam for the past two decades, ‘interpolate carefully’ sounds like a bit of, er, creative calculation. And so it has proved. Various scientists immediately spotted the flaw in Steig’s methodology of combining satellite evidence since 1979 with temperature readings from surface weather stations. The flaw they identified was that, since Antarctica has so few weather stations, the computer Steig used was programmed to guess what data they would have produced had such stations existed. In other words, the findings that caused such excitement were based on data that had been made up. Even one of the IPCC’s lead authors sniffed a problem: ‘This looks like a pretty good analysis, but I have to say I remain somewhat skeptical,’ Kevin Trenberth, climate analysis chief at the National Center for Atmospheric Research said in an e-mail. ‘It is hard to make data where none exist.’ More...
View Comments
Items of notes and interest from the web.