By Guest Column Honourable Ches Crosbie Administrator, National Citizens Inquiry——Bio and Archives--July 26, 2023
Health and Medicine | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Posted from Gather Your Wits
Canadian multidisciplinary scientist Denis Rancourt has been invited to testify to the National Citizens Inquiry three times. Why?
The Commissioners have taken an intense interest in Dr. Rancourt’s evidence because it has radical implications, implications which many scientists and freedom loving citizens critical of government COVID narratives have not yet worked through. Radical, in the sense of going to the root of things.
According to the testimony of Dr. Rancourt, there was was no viral pandemic. The implication is that it was a sham pandemic perpetrated by the military and security state through a sophisticated psychological operation against the civilian population. Yes, some people died from a virus which probably escaped from the Wuhan lab, but as with the three other declared pandemics since WW II, the deaths do not show in the excess death data. Since the advent of antibiotics and other effective medicines, pandemics, including this one, just do not show up in the death data. Wars do, intense heat waves do, earthquakes do, but not proclaimed pandemics.
What does show up in the excess death data is death caused by measures and mandates imposed since government implemented extreme rights-limiting measures in March 2020.
Excess death analysis looks at government statistics on death rates, and spikes of those death rates, in comparison with a prior period. No reliance on anyone’s interpretation of the cause of death is involved.
Dr. Rancourt’s evidence to the NCI is that the excess deaths which have occurred since 2020 were due to measures and mandates. These deaths were not an unfortunate collateral result or side-effect of necessary measures and mandates, because the measures and mandates were unnecessary and destructive, in and of themselves. They caused all the excess deaths defined by the data.
We can get an accurate sense of the thrust of this radical evidence by focussing on Dr. Rancourt’s most recent testimony, given to the NCI on June 28,2023.
The following is my summary of this radical testimony.
Dr. Rancourt explained that the purpose of his third testimony to NCI was to focus on Canadian data. Dr. Rancourt is trained as a physicist and became an interdisciplinary scientist with a long list of competencies displayed in his first slide, from statistical analysis, to geopolitics, to theoretical epidemiology. The main areas of expertise and publication relevant to COVID-19 are nanoparticles, molecular science, statistical analysis, modelling, and measurement methods. A large book of exhibits is obtainable on the National Citizens Inquiry website.
Dr. Rancourt uses excess death data to analyze the impact of the pandemic and pandemic measures. It is objective and not subject to bias. By June 2, 2020 (early in the crisis) the expert had published an article saying there were not excess deaths from COVID-19 but rather there were hotspots and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response.
These responses included lockdowns, excessively harsh medical treatments, and withholding of conventional treatments for respiratory disease like antibiotics. The conclusions offered in his previous testimony to NCI were that there was no viral pandemic causing excess mortality, rather these deaths were caused by government measures, in particular vaccination, and if governments had basically left things alone and done business as usual, there would not have been any excess mortality.
No measurable excess mortality was caused by any of the three respiratory virus pandemics declared since the end of the Second World War, a very important point. There is very significant excess mortality during the COVID period. More at 'Gather Your Wits'
Support Canada Free Press
View Comments
Items of notes and interest from the web.