If unions are so great, why are unions against having their own staffs organized?
Warner Todd Huston , Bio and Archives--May 7, 2011
American Politics, News | Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Highnote said that he experienced similar intimidation. Only two weeks after Highnote signed his union card and started an organizing campaign, a senior advisor to Hanley allegedly threatened, “I only want to say this once. Larry (Hanley) is sensitive to all of the things going on in and outside of the office. If we find out that you are discussing workplace conditions with co-workers or anyone else, then one strike and you’re out.” Other senior Hanley advisors are also alleged to have harassed and attempted to deter him from organizing, but he continued to work to form an in-house union to represent the professional staff as a bargaining unit of the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild.It is sort of a man-bites-dog story in that these union thugs are trying to prevent their own members form being unionized. Now, this isn’t the only time this has happened. Last year I reported on a similar story that happened with the United Federation of Teachers where one of its members wanted to organize the union’s HQ staff. The union was against the idea and tried to fire the organizer over it all. Still, it makes one wonder: if unions are so great, why are unions against having their own staffs organized? Clearly unions realize that unions are an impediment to the job.
View Comments
Warner Todd Huston’s thoughtful commentary, sometimes irreverent often historically based, is featured on many websites such as Breitbart.com, among many, many others. He has also written for several history magazines, has appeared on numerous TV and radio shows.
He is also the owner and operator of Publius’ Forum.