WhatFinger

Guns, Gun Control, Criminals

Why the Major Media Moguls Hate Guns


By Guest Column Bill Gibbons——--December 16, 2007

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


  “People who believe in gun control are ignorant, superstitious or stupid. Violence is not caused by inanimate objects. Criminals, by definition, do not obey laws, including gun-control laws. Therefore, the only accomplishment of gun-control laws is to assure the criminals that their victims will be unarmed.” – Charley Reese.

 Liberals, most Democratic politician and many Republican politicians hate to see the citizens of this country armed with a gun. Have you ever wondered why they hate to see guns in the hands of American citizens? We talk a lot about special interest groups and how stupid they are and we wonder how anyone could be so stupid. Criminals are cowards and every thing they do, they try to do where there is no danger to themselves. An enraged person will commit a crime, without stopping to think about the consequences, but not a criminal. A criminal must feel that the crime he is committing will not land him in the slammer. The criminal loves darkness, because his deeds are evil. The criminal wants to pick on helpless people, when he goes to commit a crime. The criminal feels safe in cities like New York and Washington, D.C., because he knows that most citizens have no guns, not even in their homes.     These shootings that we read about are not committed by criminals, but by some nut wanting to draw attention to himself. If a criminal plans to shoot someone, the coward will shoot him in the back and will seldom ever shoot it out with a man face-to-face, unless he is cornered and has no other choice. Even then he is more apt to surrender, then shoot it out with a man with a gun. The so-called hit men, never kill their victims face-to-face, because they are cowards and want to be sure that they can get away with the crime.     Over forty years ago, this humble writer figured out why the courts went easy on criminals, especially those committing crimes with guns. The courts were so lenient with criminals: that some states voted in “three strikes and you are out laws”, because the judges would continually letting them back on the streets. At first, I asked myself: Why would the judges do this. It made no sense to see a man committing a serious crime with a gun, getting off easier then a man cheating on his taxes, but it happens all the time. The corrupt judges allow criminals to go free, while sending innocent men and women to Jail. Two prominent names come to mind: Martha Stewart and the Honorable Congressman James Traficant of Ohio. It has been estimated by those who have studied the issue: that as many as 40% of those in jail are innocent of the crimes they were charged with. If this is true, and I believe it is, this is a national disgrace.     “The gun is the ideal self-defense weapon. It can be wielded by a woman, a child, an elderly person or even an invalid. There was an old saying in the American West: "God created men, but Sam Colt made them equal." – Charley Reese. With that in mind, I ask you: why do the major media moguls want to see the citizens disarmed?     The only conclusion that I could come to was this: the judges want to see criminals run loose so they can continue to commit crimes. They believe this will help lead the simple-minded people to demand that ALL GUNS BE TAKEN AWAY from all people. The total elimination of all guns in the hands of the citizenry is the ultimate goal of our unelected rulers. These people want to see the police and the armed forces, which they control, as the only ones with guns. With the people totally disarmed, they would be helpless to do anything to protect themselves from the police and the armed forces, which would mean total slavery of all the people.     Now then, I ask you, who is behind the movement to outlaw all guns in the US? The major media, television, radio, newspapers and magazines, are the movers and shakers behind the gun-control movement! If the major media was against gun control, how strong do you think the movement towards gun control would be? There would be very little chance of any gun control legislation ever seeing the light of day, because the media would be leading the fight for the Second Amendment rights of all people all the way.      The major media moguls are very cleaver in the way they support gun control. They do not want to appear against gun control themselves, so they give many hours of free publicity to the gun control nuts that do want to see the citizens unarmed. The corrupt major media gives the gun control crowd eight to nine times the free publicity that they give the pro gun crowd. This tells you whose side the major media moguls are on, so much for balanced reporting. You can see who owns the major media HERE     Sure, there are “special interest” groups wanting to see guns outlawed, but where do these “special interest” groups get the money to operate and all the free publicity to promote their insane ideas? A lot of their income comes from the federal government itself and the super rich friends of the major media moguls. So then, it ALL falls back on the Major Media Moguls and their rich friends, to finance and promote gun control.     Before this country can be turned into a giant concentration, like the Old Soviet Union, China or Cuba, the citizens must be disarmed and the major media moguls are trying to make this happen. Anyone playing with a full deck knows this is true. The founding fathers knew this and that is why they gave us the Second Amendment. During the Revolutionary war, the patriots took their own gun and ammunition to war, or there would have been no war. Let us never give up our guns, because guns are the last line of defense for the citizens of this country.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Guest Column——

Items of notes and interest from the web.


Sponsored