While we're yelling about the c-words and f-words and hate-words and every other untenable 1st Amendment-unprotected words issuing from the mouths of over-matured babies, let us not forget we have one thing--and one thing only to vote against in one month from now--and that is the corrupt entrenched swamp creators that make Washington DC their home town, coming from whatever slimy gross and disgusting rock they crawled out from under.
These career politicians share all their values with Mick Jagger and the hard rock cafe culture, taking chicks where they find them - including the chick-politicians, by the way - but they can't get no satisfaction anyway, why? Because they are rebelling against our creator, who gave us our inalienable rights in the first place...including free will, giving elites their ability to try and subjugate.
We can only vote for Trump; even if only to vote against something else. Keep in mind Trump is the candidate that all the DC career people have steadfastly stood against ever since he declared his candidacy and they threw every conceivable device in his way, to get him out, so we, or they, rather, could run Jeb or anybody 'safe' against Hillary the foreign policy expert..Hilligula Mothra-Clinton. Even if it was Jeb, and even if he 'beat' her, what would the difference be, seeing as all the Bush clan are backing the inevitable one? We cannot afford 4 more years of getting all the court-ducks in a row, and reforming of the state in to a police-state (for all we know we are there and if I tell you we all know we are there I'll probably have to kill all of us).
Keep in mind also Trump's the only man in this thing who controlled the discussion about what our government needs to do, which is to say, DO ITS JOB and enforce the laws of the land, like they swore to do when they took the oath, i.e., secure the borders, so we know who's coming in, keep 3 branches of our federal gov't in check according to law so we don't turn into a police-state; and reverse the nation's security threat of having our country foreclosed on by whomever it is we now owe 20,000,000,000 dollars to..the amount we are being told is the debt but really, they're just numbers, and as long as they're telling us twenty trillion, might not the actual damages be the double of that, since professional DC'ers are always doubling down these days? Hmm??
Finally, just as an example of how stupid the demands are that are being made on Trump by all the 'truth-seekers’ let's take the case of the 'TAXERS'..WHICH MAINTAIN WE HAVE TO SEE TRUMP'S TAX-RETURNS..as this will out Trump for the tax-hater-criminal he is; or exculpate him from being a lying, tax-dodging potty-mouth..Mexican-hating, Muslim-opposing, animal murdering son-of-a-youknowwhat.
This should be a real welcome question for Trump to address before the American people; as it already seems to have revealed a strain of hypocrisy on the part of the liberal candidate, of whom it is being said lately that she pays no taxes, while, as it turns out, the male candidate has paid hundreds of millions in taxes, let alone create a whole bunch of jobs that generate lots more tax revenues for the crooked government to STEAL FROM THE WORKERS. But to the case at hand..
(and remember when you are dealing with gobs and gobs of moolah, it isn't it really, REALLY hard to fathom all the nuances of rules of etiquette for what is taxable and what is not taxable? no mere mortal can comprehend the numbers, mind-numbing numbers that boggle the brain! That's why you have tax-lawyers, to figure all that out). So now first of all, what we have in this election-cycle is an absolute first as far as our choices of who to vote for; and normally it's normal etiquette normally speaking to be desirous of seeing the finances of a candidate, as shown by their tax-return, for so many reasons. For example, just looking ahead to the exit from the White House, 4 or 8 years later, wouldn't it be nice to know how much they had going in, versus how much they're taking with them when they leave to re-enter private life? (should we be so lucky). But I'm not talking about that, for our purposes, it's neither here nor there.
Always, and most every time before, when we are asking to see tax-returns from a political hopeful, we are talking about a career politician - like the one Trump is running against - who has their tax records prepared by their lawyers and shows their incomes as elected officials and everybody can look up what we supposedly are paying them, so what is the point? What is salient in such a discussion is that in the rare case of a Trumpian candidacy, we are looking at a non-career politician with personal business tax information that is his personal business, sometimes sensitive information that is sensitive and personal; except for the IRS' involvement in his and all of our lives. So, next of all, if the opposition is suggesting he cheats on his taxes, they are necessarily insinuating the IRS has not been not doing their job..for some time, now. And in that case they would need to look into the IRS. itself, and not the alleged offender who has not been charged by that federal agency made in charge of everybody's money, which, by the way, is patently anti-constitutional, an issue that should be looked at..but on to the next paragraph anyway)..
Trump should not show any tax-transcripts without the approval of his tax-lawyers since they seem to be in agreement with the tax-auditors, or - may I repeat it? - he should have been called out already in the case that something is not right. Trump has been a private businessman, and his is a far different world than that of a career politician. Now this is what I am getting worked up to a lather about. In all fairness, and going back to a side-issue reason for knowing a candidate's financial status going in, background research should delve into the greyer areas of finances of office-seekers, namely WHAT ARE YOU REALLY WORTH? or, in a way we all can understand, HOW MUCH ARE YOU MAKING UNDER-THE-TABLE? Trump being a businessman must declare all earnings (in theory, at least) while a professional politician - such as the running-mate, for example, who appears to have taken a lot of gifts as a former governor, but relatively small-potatoes - is often the object of desire for favor-seekers who are known to lavish gifts and cash monies to the furtherance of commercial and political advantages for their own personal enrichment..gifts that often go quite unnoticed, --like to foundations, for example. So clearly I say this, that the globalist candidate must answer the primary question, in terms all of us can understand so we may vote intelligently, when it comes down to our responsibilities as citizens of this republic, which we are charged with maintaining, according to the Constitution of the United States of America..and the question is
HOW MUCH HAVE YOU MADE AND ARE MAKING AND WILL CONTINUE TO MAKE WORKING UNDER THE TABLE..HILLARY
