Combating Voter Fraud 2016

In the upcoming election our country as a nation based on individual liberty is voting for its survival. This is not an exaggeration; it is simply a fact as Hillary Rodham Clinton is, without question, one of those individuals who seek unlimited power, simply for power’s sake. In just the past one hundred years, individuals such as Hillary have achieved unlimited power in various countries resulting in combined death tolls in the hundreds of millions. If one thinks it can’t happen here, the same opinion was doubtlessly held by a majority of Germans in 1933 when Adolph Hitler was elected Chancellor. They knew that Herr Hitler wanted power but somehow allowed themselves to be convinced that he could be controlled once he had it. History certainly showed that not to be the case. It is a very genuine risk that a Hillary Clinton presidency could be similar so all Americans who support the concept of individual freedom must act and act now to keep Hillary from achieving the power for which she so lusts.

The Democrat Party knows that Hillary Clinton is personally unlikable and that she lacks the ability to mask her lust for power which many voters do resent. As such, even with the media’s concentration on his personal faults, whether actual or fictitious, Donald Trump would almost certainly beat Hillary in an honest election. The Democrats are aware of this so, in the author’s opinion, voter fraud will be absolutely rampant in the upcoming election. This will be especially true in key states and precincts that will be necessary for Hillary to achieve an electoral victory. If we think that we have seen Democrat voter fraud in the past, even including the 1960 presidential election that was stolen for Jack Kennedy, as the saying goes; “We ain’t seen nuthin yet”. The Democrat Party has always used voter fraud at the local level to maintain their grip on local government and the corruption potentials that such power yields. In Cook County, Illinois it is so prevalent that it is an accepted joke that in Democrat precincts one was supposed to “vote early and often”. Of course locally organized fraudulent voters always impact national candidates as those voting illegally are certainly instructed to vote a straight Democrat ballot As such; we must take immediate action to have any chance of reducing the impact of voter fraud on the outcome of the 2016 election. Voter fraud is a crime which is prosecuted by local criminal justice systems. If we are to have any chance of limiting the Democrats plans to attempt to steal this election, it can only be through putting those involved on notice that indictment, conviction and imprisonment may be a real possibility for them. Those people that are organizing and implementing the attempted theft of the election in November must be placed on immediate and unmistakable notice that they are risking their own personal freedom by continuing to do so. How might this be accomplished in the remaining three weeks before the election? The author suggests establishing a “bounty fund” from which substantial rewards will be paid to “whistleblowers” or those individuals who report the voter fraud organizers to law enforcement and also provide evidence and testimony at trial to convict such perpetrators.

This video is no longer available.

Obviously setting up a bounty system as described below will require a significant amount of money. Hopefully people that see the necessity of reducing Democrat voter fraud in this election will come forward and establish a large bounty fund. The goal of such an effort will be to put the organizers of voter fraud on notice that anyone with whom they are working could potentially turn them in for the crime that they are committing and earn a sizable bounty for doing so.

• Establish a fund to pay cash rewards to “whistleblowers” that turn in perpetrators of organized voter fraud and who further serve as witnesses against such perpetrators at trial. Such rewards would be paid in part upon indictment with the balance paid upon legal conviction of the persons or persons so named.
• Such cash rewards should be as high as economically possible with a smaller portion paid upon indictment of a vote fraud organizer and the much larger balance paid upon conviction.
• Buy national radio and television time to announce this program stressing that the program is totally nonpartisan and that such rewards will be paid to all “whistleblowers” regardless of party affiliation of those charged, indicted or convicted of organizing voter fraud.

If a program such as this is to be implemented it must be done within the next week in order to have the desired effect. It is certainly more than likely that Democrat voter fraud is already ongoing in early voting. However, the vast majority of voters still vote on Election Day so that is where the effort to minimize voter fraud must be concentrated. In addition to submitting this to Canada Free Press for possibly publication, the author is also sending it by email to a number of individuals in the hopes that someone reading it might be in a position to relay it to someone in a position to implement such a program.

Stan McHugh——Bio and Archives Stan McHugh is a freelance writer.