By Alexander Maistrovoy ——Bio and Archives--December 6, 2024

Globalists are still obsessed with a Palestinian state. But there are several reasons for the Palestinians’ reluctance (not to mention the Israelis) to reach an agreement about a two-state solution, and a lasting end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, now in the 19th year of his four-year term, cannot recognize Israel as a Jewish state. To do so would contradict a basic doctrine of Islam -- that any land once conquered by Muslims, as the entire region was under the Ottoman Empire until its collapse in 1922, must forever be regarded as belonging to Allah and preserved by Muslims as a waqf [a holding or endowment]...
In Islam, the world is divided into two groups: the Dar al Islam (The House of Islam) and the Dar al Harb (the House of War). The struggle (jihad) must persist until everyone resides in the House of Islam, either as a Muslim or as an inferior, tolerated resident who accepts the sovereignty of Islam.
Included are territories conquered by Islam -- Andalusia in Spain, much of Portugal, Sicily, Malta – all of which were once part of the "House of Islam.”
The Hamas Charter with its goal of destroying "the Zionist entity" has not yet been canceled. An instructional book, the Palestinian Terminology Guide , released by the PA Ministry of Information, suggests alternative meanings to the following terms: "Israel" is replaced by "The Israeli Colonialist Occupation;" "Israel's Defense Minister" by "Israeli Minister of War," and the IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) by “Israeli occupation forces.” "Martyrdom-Seeking Operation" replaces "Suicide Bombing", "Temple Mount" by "Hiram al-Sharif", "Wailing Wall" by "Al-Buraq Wall" and, finally, the "Shield” or “Star” of David" is replaced by "Six-pointed Star".
One aim of Abbas seems to be to preserve his own wealth, estimated at $100 million and prosperity of his sons, who own the largest businesses in the Palestinian Authority.
If donors keep throwing gigantic amounts of money at one – especially unconditionally -- why not take it?
Why should he and his ‘fat cats” take responsibility for public administration when they can, without exposing yourself to the slightest risk and without doing anything, collect gigantic funds around the world and transfer them to their bank accounts in Abu Dabi and Swiss banks?
An opinion poll conducted by Birzeit University's Arab World for Research & Development (AWRAD) revealed that after the October 7 attacks
This is from the point of view of the Palestinian Arabs.
Even before October 7, 2023, the Israelis in their entirety had turned away from the idea of “peaceful coexistence.”
Much Israeli resentment seems a result of sad empirical experience. In the early 1990s, most of the Israeli public supported peace agreements and concessions. The optimism, however, soon faded away. Twice -– during the term of Prime Minister Ehud Barak at Camp David in 2000, and under that of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Annapolis in 2008 -- Israel offered the Palestinians (Palestinian Presidents Arafat and Abu Mazen, respectively) maximum concessions: about 94-95% of the West Bank (with the option of exchange for other territories) and East Jerusalem (within the framework of US President William Jefferson Clinton’s plan). Olmert was ready to consider returning 1,000 refugees a year for a period of five years on “humanitarian” grounds -- and in addition, to establish a program of “family reunification”, which, in practice, means absorbing tens of thousands of Arabs. Olmert agreed to allow "safe passage" between Gaza and Judea. Olmert even offered to transfer the control over Temple Mount to a consortium: Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the U.S., Israel and the PLO. Abbas refused without so much as a counteroffer.
After rejecting Clinton’s plan, Arafat launched a terrorist campaign the "second intifada" – which took the life of more than a thousand Israelis.
Waves of deadly terror attacks against Israelis resumed in the mid 1990s and at the beginning of the 21st century. In a situation where every attempt to achieve peace turns into another bloody war-experiment, most Israelis have apparently concluded that they would be better off without "peace".
After the rapes, tortures, beheadings, and burning babies alive on October 7, 2023, the very idea of peace with the Palestinians looks to most Israelis like a mockery or sick joke.
Finally, we can ask ourselves: do the Sunni countries in the region really want an Iran-backed terrorist Palestinian State? After seeing what the Palestinians have done to every country that has tried to help them – Jordan, which they tried to overthrow during Black September (1970-71), then Lebanon , where they began an unprovoked war in 1992, were exiled to Tunis, and finally to Israel – which, in 1993, with the benefit of 20:20 hindsight, foolishly granted the Palestinian authority legitimacy.
Of course, the last thing they want is a "Palestinian state" - a hotbed of terror, violence and instability, a haven for jihadists of all stripes and Iranian puppets.
At this point, whatever happens with a ceasefire or not, the region clearly does not seem ready for any kind of “Palestinian State” - to say the least.
View Comments
Alexander Maistrovoy is a graduate of Moscow Univ. in Journalism, worked there in his field and made aliyah in 1988. He works at the Russian language newspaper Novosty Nedely, has had articles posted on many internet sites and authored “Ways of God” about different religious and ethnic groups in the Holy Land, and with Mark Kotliarsky the Russian book Jewish Atlántida.