WhatFinger

Thankfully, in spite of all doomsday reports from pollsters, the Truth Will Always Out.

Runaway Gallup Poll Trying To Convince Folk That AOC Will Be America’s Next President


By Judi McLeod ——--August 7, 2025

Cover Story | CFP Comments | Subscribe | Email Us


Canada Free Press (CFP) is only one amidst legions of others that no longer count on Fox News or likewise legacy media for reading or hearing anything close to, THE TRUTH.

Many of us are now honing in on True-To-The-Truth news source Conservative Tree House, humbly self-described as ‘The Last Refuge Rag Tag Bunch of Conservative Misfits’, on CTH’s front page.

Subscribe

For all of us worriedly afflicted by the ‘Spidey Sense’ of what is REALLY going on in the Deep State, we should borrow from British influencer Katie Hopkin’s apt description ”BATSH-T BONKERS!” that now befits much of what is coming at us from much of U.S. Congressional sources.

Because CFP believes that CTH’s Tuesday expose 'Letters and Documents Purposefully Leaked by Main Justice Indicate Russiagate Investigation is Not Serious' stands alone, we’re posting Sundance’s Tuesday take on what is happening, word for word:

“The entire grand jury process is extremely protected as the 5th amendment requires. Fullstop.

“Unfortunately, we have a long and painful history with the Trump-era Main Justice system, intentionally leaking information to satiate the MAGA base and tamp-down demands for reform and accountability. For seven years various Trump officials have claimed to be working to bring accountability. None has been delivered.(Conservative Tree House, Aug. 5, 2025)

    "Also unfortunately, the pattern of bread and circuses is repeating. The Dept of Justice leaked a letter to The Federalist, in order to affirm their performance
      "The DOJ letter from a federal prosecutor, which was sent in response to a request from Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard for the DOJ to investigate any potential criminal wrongdoing related to the production of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that claimed without evidence that Russia sought to elect Trump in 2016, asks for 12 different categories of documents related to Gabbard’s criminal referral.
      “Pursuant to the authority and director of the United States Attorney General, I have been assigned responsibility for investigating this criminal referral,” the letter states.
      "In addition to requesting all documents, intelligence, and correspondence related to Gabbard’s memo exposing the conspiracy to fabricate and mischaracterize intelligence for the purpose of smearing Trump, the DOJ letter also requests all records supporting the recently declassified oversight report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), all information related to whistleblower complaints about Brennan, Clapper, or Comey’s attempts to manipulate the process, and the identification of “all persons cited in” Gabbard’s memo, the HPSCI oversight report, related whistleblower records, and the ICA itself.
Donate

    "Obviously, The Federalist is well aware of who the assigned “prosecutor” is. However, telling the audience that name does not support the ongoing ‘clickbait’ performance as orchestrated by Pam Bondi’s Dept of Justice. After all, there’s the important public opinion to be shaped.(Conservative Tree House)
    "The DOJ sending this letter to journalist Sean Davis is a case study in exactly what ‘Bread and Circuses’ looks like.
    "The DOJ providing this letter directly to The Federalist, indicates the purpose of Pam Bondi’s DOJ action is performative; not substantive. If the DOJ does not want to compromise their grand jury case, then why are they leaking their letters? Simply, think about it.
    "The compromise and motive to note is not in the reporting per se’; it’s in the DOJ selective (purposeful) leaking. And in this example, it indicates a profound lack of seriousness.
    "It’s likely the DOJ knows the challenge of the case is a very high bar and they are unlikely to clear it. So, what they are doing is appeasing the ‘Russiagate’ crowd, with the performance of the investigation itself. However, this is a very dangerous approach to take given the nature of seven years of bread and circuses in the background.
    "If the cases were perceived as solid and serious, there would be no reason for Pam Bondi’s DOJ to be leaking internal documents to Fox News, Mollie Hemmingway, John Solomon, Sean Davis or any other media outlet.
    "Fox News originally broke the story of the Grand Jury after they were sent documents from Bondi’s authorization of a prosecutor to review evidence and empanel a grand jury. Now Pam Bondi’s assigned prosecutor is sending copies of his/her letters to The Federalist.
    "Does this sound like serious investigative action taken by serious Main Justice leadership? No, unfortunately it sounds like a profoundly unserious ‘tick-tock’ screenplay is being delivered, because that is exactly what these actions indicate.
    "We have experienced seven-years of ‘tick-tocking’, and intentional leaks, orchestrated for a purpose other than truth and justice. We The People deserve better.
    "If the DOJ is going to leak letters and documents to ‘CONservative’ media for clickbait excitement, the outlook for serious legal accountability is not good."

Gaslighting, which has become a commonplace tool for the left’s attempted demoralization of the masses, is not just a province of the current legacy media. Both Pre and Post Election polls have long been, and still are, in on the act.

'President Trump trails progressive stalwarts Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in favorability polling, according to a new survey conducted by Gallup'(News Headline, The Hill, Aug. 5, 2025).

    “The poll, which was released Tuesday morning, found that among 14 prominent figures, Trump’s net favorable rating was negative 16 points, with 41 percent of respondents having a favorable view of the president and 57 percent saying the opposite. Another 2 percent had no opinion about Trump.”

Incredibly, Gallup wants a demoralized-by-media America to believe that commie-crazed Ocasio-Cortez will be America’s next president!

The following tracking places that chilling possibility—and lists as bottom last—at the very bottom—that their poll represents the opinions of a mere, 1,002 adults rated between July 7-21. In other words, 1000 respondents in a population of some 340.1 million Americans.

According to Gallup, which trotted the information out as though it was REAL News, the margin of error was 4 percentage points.

For credibility, newspapers and online news sites include their sources. With pollsters, readers are left without knowing who the pollsters are talking to in the anonymous people they question.

No way of knowing if they are even American citizens.

The following is what Gallup wants readers to believe:

    “Ocasio-Cortez’s net favorability was negative 4 points, with 34 percent having a favorable view of her and 38 percent having an unfavorable one. About 28 percent had no opinion about her. (The Hill)
    “Former President Biden, whose public support while in office never recovered after dropping midway through his term, accumulated a negative 11 point favorable rating, placing him in the middle of the list. About 43 percent of U.S. adults had a favorable view of Biden, while 54 percent said the opposite. Another 3 percent had no opinion.
    “Pope Leo XIV had the most positive image out of the 14 public figures on the list, with 57 percent having a favorable view and 11 percent having an unfavorable one. About 31 percent had no opinion about the American-born pontiff.
    “Second on the list was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with a positive 18 rating, while Sanders was in third place at positive 11, the survey found.
    “California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Vice President Vance had an identical net favorability of negative 11 points.
    “Among Trump administration officials, the favorability has dropped the most for Secretary of State Marco Rubio and tech billionaire Elon Musk, with each dropping by 24 points, Gallup noted. Rubio’s net favorability is at negative 16 points, with 31 percent having a favorable view of the former Florida senator and 47 percent having an unfavorable one.
    “Musk, the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency who had a public fallout with Trump over the president’s signature tax and spending bill was at the bottom of the list with negative 28 net favorability, a 24-point drop since January.
    “Gallup noted the “dampened favorable ratings of key Trump administration officials since January are broadly consistent with the decline in Trump’s job approval rating over the same period, down 10 percentage points.”
    “A late July Gallup poll found that Trump’s approval rating was at 37 percent, down 10 points since taking office. A recent The Economist/YouGov survey found the president’s net approval rating to be 15 points underwater.”

Thanks, but No Thanks, Gallup, or any other polls (like most rendered by Fox News) are worthy of our time. They, like the Fake News of our day, are absolutely BONKERS!

Pollsters—the original paid influencers— have serious negative impacts on upcoming elections—yet continue to have no oversight from credible authorities.

Throw into this ungodly mess, the arsenic of Artificial Intelligence now involved.

Thankfully, in spite of all doomsday reports from pollsters, the Truth Will Always Out.

Meanwhile, we can be sure that Google is already on the lookout to suppress stories such as this one.

The best Truth Teller for 2,000 years-plus has always been—and will always be—The IrrefutableTruth.


View Comments

Judi McLeod—— -- Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.


{lockerdome-smartview-article-sticky}