By Russ Cooper ——Bio and Archives--September 10, 2026
Canadian News, Opinion | CFP Comments | Subscribe | Email Us
Five years after the fact, Canada is finally getting to hear the stories of those who were seriously injured by Wuhan virus vaccines. How is it that our public health and political authorities could treat such claims as frivolous and the stuff of tin foil hats? And how is it that the egregious treatment of doctors who called for caution during the vaccine rollout, by these same authorities, remains uncontested? Sit in on this scintillating conversation to find answers to these questions and many more related to the vaccine injury file!
For those of you on the run and short of time, here’s a 11-minute video presentation of this C3RF Update!
For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open. Luke 8:17
The phrase “the truth will out” comes to us by virtue of Shakespeare’s play, “The Merchant of Venice”. In it the character Lancelot Gobbo jokes that, “Truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long; a man's son may, but in the end truth will out.” And so it is today as bits and pieces of information are assembled before our eyes to reveal the presence of closely held secrets. One such secret is the origin of the Wuhan virus while another speaks to the fact that the follow-on vaccine was known to be harmful to pregnant women and their babies even before it was recommended to them. These unintended disclosures came to us via the release of American public documents in the form of Dr. Anthony Fauci's diary. Amazingly, and to the benefit of truth-seeking citizens, the good doctor would faithfully chronicle his actions and thoughts on a daily basis through his own written word. Whether it be for posterity or pridefulness, Fauci kept fulsome records in the best traditions of the Nazi regime.
Does the world owe Dr. Fauci a note of thanks for keeping such a detailed diary?
In an unbelievable turn of events, the good doctor would compile his meticulous diary and place his entries on government databases. This freely given information would come to the attention of Senator Rand Paul who would, in turn, bring it forward for public viewing in a dedicated “Reading Room”. The diary was not only gobsmacking for what it detailed regarding the Wuhan virus situation but for what he knew on the one hand and told the public on the other. The diary details:
These mismatches between what Fauci knew and what he told the public would go on to have real and adverse impacts on the Canadian public. This, as their own public health institutions would turn the latter into policies that would both crush their civil liberties while harming them physically.
Rand Paul opens Pandora's Box by tabling the Fauci diaries!
The crushing of civil liberties, that was engineered by those in Canada who fawningly followed Fauci's science, was then cast in concrete by Canadian courts. One of the first cases to do so was the subject of a C3RF Update way back in October of 2020. The case was “Taylor v Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)” and it found that the applicant, and eventual appellant, Ms. Taylor, had her mobility rights infringed upon when she was forbidden to travel to her mother's funeral in NL. It simultaneously ruled, however, that such an infringement was justified given the threat to the population that such travel posed. The case would go all the up to the Supreme Court of Canada which agreed with the lower court's findings but, as noted in the C3RF Update, it would accept the veracity of grossly exaggerated fatality data upon which the case hinged. This data, espoused by Dr. Fauci, stated that the Wuhan virus was 10 times more lethal that the seasonal flu - even if it was not as deadly as the 3.4% cited by the World Health Organization. The Crown would use the 3.4% data point and, in doing so, misrepresent the danger of Ms. Taylor's travel plans. Indeed, the exaggerations were debunked before the introduction of NL travel restrictions by world renowned epidemiologist, John Loannidis. He noted that actual rates “for those less than 65 years old and no comorbidities was ‘equivalent to driving a car as little as four miles a day’”. Fauci's and the World Health Organization's codswallop would be accepted blindly by Canada's judicial system and Canadian freedoms would be drastically, and unnecessarily, curtailed.
Our judicial system locked in fake, Fauci science but, still, the truth will out?
If the truth had been allowed to come forward in the Taylor case, it would have been hard to see how depriving her of travel to her mother's funeral could even have been considered. The fact that it was speaks poorly of a public health system that was incapable of putting two plus two together to get four. This inability in the face of John Loannnidis' research and the trashing of research conducted by Neil Ferguson at the Imperial College, both of which were available before the Taylor trial, speaks to a preference to keep inconvenient truths from bobbing up to the surface. One is left to imagine just what the nature of the inconvenience was that justified keeping the truth submerged. We can, however, postulate that the inconvenience was of such a magnitude that it vindicated offshoring Canada's own, in-place pandemic measures to co-opt those that had been newly minted by the World Health Organization (WHO). Measures that departed considerably from “WHO's own Pandemic Planning Guidelines of 2019”.
Canada felt obliged, as a good global citizen, to follow newly minted WHO guidelines?
Perhaps the premier case of government perfidy used to stymy truth, save, arguably, for the efforts aimed at keeping the terms of the aborted trade deal of 21 August 2026 out of the public square, is the full court press used by the Ottawa Police Service to keep one Detective Helen Grus from bringing expert evidence to her tribunal proceedings. Recall that she had the temerity to follow through on her responsibilities as a member of the Service's Sexual Assault and Child Abuse (SACA) squad to investigate a cluster of unusual infant deaths. Also recall that the adjudicator of her case nearly fell off of his chair when her defense tried to table Pfizer's own data that pointed to a 97% fatality rate for babies whose mothers had taken the Wuhan virus vaccine during their pregnancies. Det. Grus would be found guilty of “discreditable” conduct and be demoted for her efforts to get to the bottom of unexplained infant deaths. Best that these deaths go unaddressed than allow the truth to surface? Best that Fauci's upfront lie about the safety of the Wuhan virus jab for pregnant women and their newborns be allowed to live on past Grus' disciplinary proceedings so that Canadian mothers and their babies can keep on suffering?!!
Ottawa Police Service Detective Helen Grus, punished for investigating infant deaths!
The problem with keeping the truth from being known is that regular folk, attached through their labours to the real world, see through the lies and the gaslighting. Indignation is not far behind as is action directed towards confronting those who would manipulate them so. Canada saw this reaction take place in spades when the world-changing Freedom Convoy 2022 started rolling down Canada's highways to seek redress from their political leaders in Ottawa. Then, as now with the vaccine injured, truckers would see themselves denied an audience with the authorities that mandated they be vaccinated. How could it be that they would go from being heroes saving the nation with their selfless transportation efforts to being villains for requesting an audience with the prime minister so they might table their concerns and evidence? For their constitutionally sanctioned efforts they would have the Emergencies Act sicked upon them lawlessly by their own federal government. One wonders, are the vaccine injured risking Emergencies Act measures as they assemble in Ottawa to participate in the Allison Inquiry?
MP Dean Allison opens the floor to the vaccine injured, is he risking the deployment of the Emergencies Act?
And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. ~ John 8:32
The question is not a moot one as Canadian institutions and authorities have demonstrated a ruthless capacity to quell challenges to their preferred narratives. These narratives include “diversity is our strength” and the proof of the Canadian regime's diehard drive to force this ideology down the throats of its citizens is evident through its legislative record. These efforts were progressed across both national and international venues and were characterized by the normalization and recruiting of cultures that have historically been antithetical to the Western concept of individual rights and freedoms. On the national front, these initiatives included a 2017 “Motion M-103” that declared “Islamophobia” to be Canada's curse even as columnist Barbara Kay tagged the term as a forerunner “to a repressive blasphemy law”. On the international side of the ledger, Canadians were blindsided by their political representatives signing onto the United Nation's Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. This Compact would affirm the open borders policies kicked off by Germany's Angela Merkel in 2015 and justify Canada's opening of its own doors to the country's detriment.
Canadian government blindsides its citizens with Motion M-103 and the Global Compact on Migration. Catastrophe followed!
The truth behind the mantra “diversity is our strength” has been submerged by strong coercive messaging (you're a racist!) and a complicit media machine but, like a balloon filled with air underwater, sooner or later it will rise to the surface. And so it is with reports from around the world that pinpoint reckless and massive open-door policies as the genesis of skyrocketing “brutal attacks carried out by illegal immigrants”. The UK's Rape Gang Inquiry Report, organized and coordinated by the Restore Britain party, may have gone unreported by the legacy media writ-large but its impact on rank-and-file citizens is unmistakeable. And so it is with other European so-called “far right” parties as they see their own electoral prospects ramp up exponentially. This dynamic, generated by regular folk recognizing a concealed truth that can no longer be denied, grows with each attempt to manipulate the media landscape. Indeed, the measure of the impact of truth coming to the surface can be calibrated by the ferocity of the pushback by establishment echo chambers. Hence recent charges that are desperately trying to link the Restore Britain party to Nazism even as police media releases “try to regularly exclude the immigration status of perpetrators”.
Rupert Lowe of Restore Britain (left) must be over the target as he gets called a "Nazi". Par for the course?
Unfortunately, or fortunately if you're a fan of civil liberties, the gate keepers of the “diversity is our strength” ideology along with all the other DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) banalities are running out of ammunition as multitudes emerge with effective, truth-based counter narratives. After all, how many times can you slag truth-seekers with epithets like racist, Islamophobe or Nazi before you become the bigot? It appears that time is not on the side of the ideologues as in the field of:
As raw and naked truths take hold, who would want to be a bigoted gaslighter?
Are DEI ideologues, like Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez (left), running out of ammunition?
Thanks for your continued support
Your patronage makes a world of difference in the ability of C3RF to educate, advocate and act in service of preserving the individual and fundamental rights of all Canadians. Please consider clicking here to support C3RF today. And while you're considering making a difference, please follow C3RF on Facebook, on Twitter, on Gab, on Gettr and on our web site and share with friends our great content and a realistic outlook on the continuing battle for Charter rights in Canada. You can also view our social media archive here and view our videos here as well as on YouTube, on Rumble and on Odysee.
Major Russ Cooper (Ret'd)
President and CEO, C3RF
View Comments
Major Russ Cooper (Ret’d), Founding Member, Board Chair, President and CEO of Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms (C3RF).
Russ Cooper is retired from both the Royal Canadian Air Force and Air Canada. In his military career, he was a decorated CF18 combat pilot and served in several staff positions as a Director of major capital acquisition projects. In the civilian aviation sector, he complimented service as an international airliner pilot with national responsibilities in the field of post 9/11 civil aviation security. He is published internationally in this latter area.
Now fully retired from his follow-on career as a Human Factors Engineer and a Transport Canada Flight Test Pilot delegate, he is pursuing an abiding interest in the preservation of fundamental Canadian Charter rights. This latter pursuit has been prompted by his sense that these rights, hard-won by the sacrifice of Canadians past, are under attack and on the verge of being lost.