By Elizabeth Marshall —— Bio and Archives December 20, 2023
Comments | Print This | Subscribe | Email Us
Perhaps Canadians have forgotten, or perhaps they don’t realize how short of time we have, but the statement by Prime Minister Trudeau, in 2013, seems to have some relevance with this government.
A reminder--Prime Minister Trudeau was chastised for his “… level of admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to “…go green … we need to start investing in solar.’”[1]
One can hardly blame him for his, perhaps, fatal opinion as it could be an inherited trait, for the young Prime Minister. In 1968 there was report “The Canadian Intelligence Service, Vol. 18, No. 3”[2] which laid out the philosophy of our present Prime Minister’s Father. This is supported by the article in the Washington Times (1985) “Trudeau blamed for KGV’s 20-year foothold in Canada,” released by the CIA in 2012.[3]
Unfortunately, this might pertain to all Liberal MPs and/or MPPs. This statement is from reading the Liberal Party Constitution, but what is even more evident is with the present coalition between the Liberals and the NDP it seems, as if, the Father’s ideology and philosophy has come to fruition, doesn’t it?
From “The Canadian Intelligence Service, Vol. 18, No. 3”:
And, perhaps this is where the present Prime Minister has decided to implement his Great New Reset with his forcing Canadians to stop purchasing the vehicles of their choice? Under the “Electric Vehicle Availability Standard” Canadians should all be prepared for the actions of what can only be described as an anti-prosperity mandate by the present government--not to mention a very undemocratic one.
As expressed by media we only have 2 years before 20% of vehicle sales must be “Zero-emission vehicles.” By 2030--only 6 years away--it must be 60% and by 2035 it must be 100%.[5] Henry Ford would be rolling in his grave when one thinks that he had to create his first vehicles without having a dictator instruct people to buy it, wouldn’t he? He did this all under freedom of choice--horse and buggy v. automobile. Whereas this government, in its drive to find acceptance with China, has become an over-arching government bent on interference, which could lead one to believe that we are no longer living in a “free and democratic society,” couldn’t it?
Very little, though, is said about infrastructure for this China solution, as it will cost billions to ensure that every home has a plug in and 240 hook-up, won’t it? So, who is to pay for all of this--it would seem the private citizen. We also must be informed that China’s goal is to “conquer new foreign markets shares in the field of green technologies”[6] as its main reason for its support of the climate change initiative, but is it only the “green technologies” they want to corner the market on? It seems they are not merely interested in “green tech” but have a gambit of items on their bucket list.
Perhaps it's time for Canadians to realize, in just 6 short years you had better become certified in your training on how to harness your horse and hitch your buggy, or you might be walking to town for those groceries, particularly “As of May 2023, 10.1% of Canada’s commuters or 1.6 million people, travelled to work using public transit...”[7] And what of the majority of Canadians who do not have public transit and live too far away from urban centres, considering a charge only lasts so far and in winter even less than what is advertised?
• Elizabeth Marshall on Facebook
• Non-Partisan Advocate
• Director of Research Ontario Landowners Association
• Author – “Property Rights 101: An Introduction”
• Board Member/Secretary – Canadian Justice Review Board
• Legal Research – Green and Associates Law Offices, etc.,
• Legislative Researcher – MPs, MPPs, Municipal Councilors,
• President All Rights Research Ltd.,
I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice. Any information relayed is for informational purposes only. Please contact a lawyer.