WhatFinger

Why the U.S. needs a space-based missile defense against an EMP attack.

What a Single Nuclear Warhead Could Do


Guest Column image

By —— Bio and Archives November 25, 2008

Comments | Print This | Subscribe | Email Us

- BRIAN T. KENNEDY As severe as the global financial crisis now is, it does not pose an existential threat to the U.S. Through fits and starts we will sort out the best way to revive the country's economic engine. Mistakes can be tolerated, however painful. The same may not be true with matters of national security.
Although President George W. Bush has accomplished more in the way of missile defense than his predecessors -- including Ronald Reagan -- he will leave office with only a rudimentary system designed to stop a handful of North Korean missiles launched at our West Coast. Barack Obama will become commander in chief of a country essentially undefended against Russian, Chinese, Iranian or ship-launched terrorist missiles. This is not acceptable. The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, have proven how vulnerable we are. On that day, Islamic terrorists flew planes into our buildings. It is not unreasonable to believe that if they obtain nuclear weapons, they might use them to destroy us. And yet too many policy makers have rejected three basic facts about our position in the world today: More...



Guest Column -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Items of notes and interest from the web.


Sponsored