A Dying UK Demonstrates Immigration Hypocrisy On Steroids

This notice came just days after she accused Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer of allowing "the ongoing rape and killing of British girls by migrant rape gangs." Additionally, she criticized Starmer for threatening to block X in the name of "safety.

The UK’s way of life and culture has been in the toilet for a decade plus. They have been circling the drain for at least the last five, and the woke leadership has pressed the flush handle halfway down, and they’re leaning hard to end their country’s traditions and heritage.

The Irony here is almost as thick as Kier Starmer’s head. For years, organized rape gangs have roamed the streets of the UK, terrorizing and ruining the lives of women in the UK. No one took action because they didn’t want to be considered anti-immigration. These illegals are coming from countries where raping women is legal, it’s almost a sport, and even though the UK knew this, they allowed it to happen and ignored the safety of their own citizens.

Yet Starmer, who has allowed millions of illegals to flow into the UK and destroy their way of life, bans a white Dutch female who disagrees with his immigration policies.

Vlaardingerbroek believes in the "Great Replacement Theory,” which was popularized by French author Renaud Camus, that claims that white populations in Western nations are being replaced by non-white, largely Muslim, immigrants.

Sadly, the “Great Replacement” is no longer a theory; it’s a reality, which can only be neutralized by “Remigration,” an idea that the left despises because it’s logical.

The radical left wants you to think that those on the right use the term to refer to the planned or forced removal of immigrants and their descendants from a country, aiming to create ethnically or culturally homogeneous nations. However, their perspective is total bullsh*t.

Defending your country from an invasion of ILLEGALS, who have no intention of assimilating into your society or respecting your heritage and culture, is the right thing to do.

Starmer has allowed an unchecked flow of illegals to decimate his country, and yet this thin-skinned snowflake uses the ridiculous excuse that Vlaardingerbroek’s "presence in the U.K. is not conducive to the public good."

This narcissism that the left wears like a badge of honor is disgusting. Their ideals are openly in conflict with any type of reality, so how can a nation accept this as logic?

Vlaardingerbroek’s presence is a danger, but not to the citizens of the UK. Her presence and her doctrines will enflame the reality of what is taking place. The UK is becoming a Muslim-dominated country, and Starmer doesn’t want anyone to further the awakening of the public to that reality.

Starmer is a leftist puppet. Woke is too tame of a term for what is happening globally. No one pays attention to it anymore, even though it is the cesspool from which every liberal delusion is drawn.

One of my granddaughters is planning on attending graduate school in London. We are actively trying to convince her otherwise, and even though she doesn’t realize it yet, we will be successful.

We will also be working on a term to replace woke,…” damaged” comes to mind, but all suggestions are welcome. The UK is lost, Canada is teetering, and the U.S. is in a dogfight every day.

Either we win or the world as we know it is over. That’s what the left is counting on. These people are “Damaged” and cannot be allowed to be in power.