O'Toole said his campaign isn't about sanitizing the past. "I think we can be proud of our past and commit to being better," he said.
"But the response is not to erase our heritage and patriotism today for the horrible acts of the past. It's about educating, it's about learning, it's reconciliation — and that means reconciling the past with today."
Still, many indigenous activists continue to focus only on the alleged “horrible acts,” claiming that Macdonald's tenure is simply not worth marking in any form.
Omeasoo Wahpasiw, a professor of indigenous studies at Carleton University, said restoring any tribute to Macdonald is "a terrible idea."
"We don't even know what kind of person he was besides an alcoholic," she said in an interview, referencing Macdonald's documented heavy drinking. (It is rarely mentioned that he was totally sober later in life.)
"We know that he got a bunch of other people together in a room and somehow convinced them to do something that at the time was a fiction and continues to be a fiction," Wahpasiw said, referring to the idea that the political borders of Canada are artificial constructs on the ancestral lands of indigenous peoples, a claim subverted by both the dozens of treaties ceding these land to the British Crown, on the one hand, and by the fact that the ancestral lands now being claimed were the ancestral lands of previous occupants, peoples whose territories were repeatedly seized for millennia via warfare, expulsion, or other means, on the other.
"He's a symbol of nation-building for Canadians, and he's a symbol for genocide to another group of people. Erecting a statue, it doesn't just rub me the wrong way, it sends the wrong message about who Canadians think they are and who they want to be," she said.
"Sir John A. represents genocide — so not cool."
Other scholars and legal experts have strongly challenged these claims using hard evidence to do so.
J.D.M. Stewart, an educator, historian and expert on Canada's prime ministers, said the push to remove references to Macdonald robs future generations of a chance to learn about him, warts and all.
Stewart said activists' demands to conceal Macdonald render him a bad guy of history, when, to him, the record is much more complicated and nuanced.
"History is a very complex subject. There's no black and white. There is a lot of gray. And I don't think the way that we've reacted to these stories over the last five or 10 years has demonstrated that kind of reasoned reflection," Stewart said.
"Some of those criticisms may be true, but it doesn't mean that the other parts of what some of these leaders did was not important and visionary for the country," he said, referencing Macdonald's push to build the transcontinental railway that successfully bound the country together from east to West to stop American annexation, among other accomplishments.