The district court then agreed that Louisiana was likely to win its challenge to the Mifepristone regulation and was suffering irreparable harm from it. However, the court declined to stay the regulation and then Louisiana appealed to the Fifth Circuit and sought a stay while the litigation proceeded.
In the Fifth Circuit’s ruling on Friday it stated, “Every abortion facilitated by FDA’s action cancels Louisiana’s ban on medical abortions and undermines its policy that ‘every unborn child is human being from the moment of conception and is, therefore, a legal person.’ Once lost, that sovereign prerogative of protecting unborn life cannot be regained by legal remedy. And because FDA ‘is entitled to sovereign immunity,’ Louisiana’s financial harms are also irremediable.”
The appeals court also stated, “In response, FDA conceded it had failed to adequately study whether remotely prescribing mifepristone is safe. But the agency resisted staying the regulation, arguing it was in the midst of a comprehensive review of mifepristone protocols. The agency, however, could not say when that review might be complete and admitted it was still collecting data.”
An April 2025 study from the Ethics and Public Policy Center found that nearly 11 percent of women who take Mifepristone experience serious adverse health events, including “sepsis, infection, hemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, hospitalization, emergency room visits related to the abortion, need for a surgical abortion due to incomplete abortion, and other abortion-specific complications.”
Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded the FDA’s mail order rule was unlawful and undermines state abortion laws. The FDA’s deregulatory actions regarding abortion drugs are destroying innocent children and harming women. The FDA should longer be allowed to violate federal law and circumvent state abortion laws by facilitating abortion pill trafficking nationwide through the mail. Chemical abortions are never safe and harm women and kill children. While the temporary administrative stay is in effect pending the responsive briefing, the U.S. Supreme Court when given the opportunity should uphold this ruling.”