Climate Scare Blown Up By Geology

We rarely see geologists interviewed in the press about climate change. Sure, we often hear from excited meteorologists, biologists, chemists, sometimes physicists and of course the ubiquitous climate modelers (who pretend to know what the climate will be in 100 years) on TV and in newspapers, when the media bothers to interview scientists at all. But almost never do we see interviews with scientists who study what actually happened in the real world when carbon dioxide (CO₂) was many times higher than today.

The reason is simple: many geologists simply do not buy into the climate scare at all. They understand that, even with a 50% rise in CO₂ since 1880, today’s level of the gas is very low in comparison with most of the geologic record. They also know that, despite a 1.2-degree Celsius rise in the so-called global average temperature since 1880, we actually live in unusually cold times. Indeed, we are still in the Quaternary glaciation, or ice age, that started about 2.58 million years ago.

By RiverFred on 2023 09 15

Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’
By: The Epcoh Times, August 14, 2023:
Two prominent climate scientists have taken on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) new rules to cut CO2 emissions in electricity generation, arguing in testimony that the regulations “will be disastrous for the country, for no scientifically justifiable reason.”
Citing extensive data to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong.
“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.”
“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly over predict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”

By Centrewing on 2023 09 15

Great Article, thank you. I wonder when thought and common sense will ever be present again. Even just knowing enough to look up things being pushed on us all so you become knowledgeable read all sides on the topic. Although computers contain all kinds of good information there is also much bad, especially the weaponized UN theories they want you to believe or trick us "fools" with.

By Jason in WA on 2023 09 15

The only point of contention is that "we" didn't raise CO2 to over 440ppm. It can be proposed that human activity increased the .04% by 30ppm, but even that is not a fact, just a theory.

By Stang on 2023 09 16

I realize there are time restraints in television..but. It sure seemed odd that as soon as the scientist talking to Laura mentioned an election where fraud is being perpetrated on the citizens of Ottawa it was time to go. The man never had time to finish what he started
Excuse me while I ver off course here but Of all the people who submit to your news letter I find Ray DiLorenzo to be the most astute at what’s really happening with our world ( next to you of course Judy). In the article just before this one titled, “ 14 months to live “ he so plainly lays out what is before us in the coming 14 months. And what to expect after the next election, if we do not stop the insanity.
We caught another glimpse of it here with the Fox interview. Never enough time for the alternative view or the person who may be able to shed a little more light on the situation from a political point of view. It gets cut off.
For us reading CFR we understand the situation, the subtle ways they manipulate the news and what really gets out to the masses. It’s the people who do not know or do not want to know or don’t care to know that need to be informed.
How the hell do we inform them? How can we show them in this limited amount of time that it’s all garbage. The climate crap they are selling. We know it’s garbage but how do we tell the world? We know it’s garbage but we keep rehashing it to each other over and over again while they just keep cutting us off.
They are winning in a big way, these climate fraud perpetrators. As we write and write and complain about their tactics they laugh in our faces. We have nothing at all to counter their lies…Nothing. We pin all our hopes on Trump. Where did that get us last time?
Ray I realize it complicated and there is not one single answer but please, please give us your opinion on what we can do or at least try to do before our 14 months are up. Your are right and after this next election they won’t even have to use climate lies anymore.
They will own us…

Support Canada Free Press