WhatFinger

Myocarditis The Covid Vaxx and Kids: What you must know


Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy


CFP Comments


Comments

By William Dobni on 2022 09 25

everything in medicine is a risk-benefit ratio .... the treatment should never be worse than the disease but every drug and/or treatment has some kind of defined risk or side-effect including vaccines.....the only kinds of drugs that have no side effects are those that are totally inert.

we vaccinate the children mainly to reduce them from being a reservoir and a vector for a virus that kills the elderly.....is it proper and ethical to vaccinate the youngest among us in order to protect the oldest? maybe not, but vaccinating the youngest amongst us has been the standard of care and the highest pinnacle of preventive public health medicine for more than 150 years and in general the results have been universally positive in the aggregate

so the question becomes...should we stop vaccinating children because the vaccine makes one child sick? how about 30 children? what if it makes 300 children sick and kills 5? is that sufficient reason to deny vaccine to 2 million other children who derive benefit

these are ethical questions that accompany every drug evaluation and the answers are usually not clear cut

so putting aside entirely the question of risk/benefit ratios of any drug or vaccine the question we should maybe be asking is does the state have the right ethically and morally to compel any citizen to accept any kind of drug or treatment for the greater good of the overall body politic? (as in preventing polio or smallpox or typhoid outbreaks or malaria etc.) should the state be allowed to compel the citizen to have any medical intervention at all?

there is no right or wrong answer....the state can compel all kinds of behaviors and deprivations and suffering in the form of taxes and penalties on the citizen right up to and including his life in wartime conscription.....the question of who needs and gets what medical interventions is almost entirely political under socialized medicine.

does the citizen own his own body? in times of abundance, prosperity, peace and overall good health we like to think so.....but we don't....in any society everybody has some master over him and some rules to follow and they are often both draconian and legal and can and often do include compulsory medical/surgical interventions.

that's basically why huge megastates and megacountries are all failures at the personal level....9 people are in authority over 335 million or 6 people in authority over 1.4 billion, even if elected 'democratically'...surely there is no greater definition of despotism or surefire recipe for unrest and disaster.



Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Recommended by Canada Free Press


Subscribe

Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->