My Doctor Is Now the IRS
Obamacare is the biggest victory for President Obama, biggest loss of personal freedom, downgrading of medical care quality, highest tax hike
The Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, “A Brief Overview of the Law, Implementation, and Legal Challenges,” gives a new definition to Nancy Pelosi’s statement that we had “to pass Obamacare to find out what’s in it.” Not only did Congressmen not read the 2,700-page law before they voted and passed it by twisting arms and briberies, but they now have to be informed of the disaster they have created. (C. Stephen Redhead, Hinda Chaikind, Bernadette Fernandez, Jennifer Staman, July 3, 2012)
The unfortunately named Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010, passed by 111th Congress, touted the following:
- increased access to health insurance coverage (not necessarily access to health care)
- expansion of federal private health insurance market requirements
- creation of health insurance exchanges to provide individuals and small employers with access to insurance
- expansion of Medicaid coverage
The federal government pledged to cover the cost of the most massive bureaucratic expansion of our health care system by an increase in tax revenues and reduction in spending on Medicare and other federal health programs.
According to the Congressional Budget Office estimates, Obamacare will add at least $1 trillion dollars to spending over the next ten years. Since we are already broke, do we really need more spending we cannot afford?
As soon as Obamacare became law, the legal challenges began. Individuals, states, and other groups sued on constitutional grounds - the forced mandate for individuals to purchase health insurance being beyond Congress’s enumerated powers. The states sued because the expansion of Medicaid infringed on states’ rights, forcing them to accept “onerous conditions in exchange for federal funds.”
The Supreme Court issued on June 28, 2012 its decision on National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. The findings were as follows:
- “the individual mandate is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s authority to levy taxes”
- “the individual mandate is not a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause or the Necessary and Proper Clause”
- “In regards to the Medicaid expansion, the federal government cannot terminate current Medicaid program federal matching funds if a state refuses to expand its Medicaid program”
- “If a state accepts the new Obamacare Medicaid expansion funds, it must abide by the new expansion coverage rules”
- A state can refuse to participate in the expansion without losing any of its current federal Medicaid matching funds”
- “All other provisions of Obamacare remain intact” (ACA: Summary, July 3, 2012)
- High-risk uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions
- Reinsurance program to reimburse employers for a portion of the health insurance claims costs for 55-64 year old retirees (unions must be protected)
- Small business tax credits for businesses with less than 25 full-time “equivalents” (FTEs), average wages below $50,000 who choose to offer health insurance.(suddenly, employees have become “equivalents” in federal jargon)
- Prior to 2014, “states may choose voluntarily to expand their Medicaid programs”
- Children under 19 cannot be denied insurance and benefits based on preexisting conditions
- Major medical plans cannot impose any lifetime dollar limits on essential health benefits and are prohibited from doing so beginning in 2014 (Does anyone believe that these companies will stay in business after 2014?)
- Preventive care with no cost sharing must be provided
- Coverage cannot be rescinded except in case of fraud
- Insurers must have an appeals process for coverage and claims (I thought that existed already, are they trying to reinvent the wheel?)
- Insurers have to limit the ratio of premiums spent on administrative costs v. medical costs – called the medical loss ratio, MLRs.
“Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal Protection Clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment Clause, and Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the U.S. Constitution by exempting Muslim citizens, and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U.S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt.” (July 5, 2012, 113-page complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California)The stark truth in Realityville is that Obamacare is the biggest victory for President Obama, the biggest loss of personal freedom in America, the downgrading of medical care quality to levels of third world nations, the highest tax hike in the history of our country, and the biggest usurpation of our Constitution. Columnist Note: Credit due to Honorable David Kithil of Marble Falls, Texas for providing specific page numbers from HB3200
Read next: Can AI Bypass Your Doctors And Write Prescriptions? One State Says Yes
Email Us | Reader Friendly | Comments
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh——Bio and Archives
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh, Ileana Writes is a freelance writer, author, radio commentator, and speaker. Her books, “Echoes of Communism", "Liberty on Life Support" and "U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy," "Communism 2.0: 25 Years Later" are available at Amazon in paperback and Kindle.
