WhatFinger


The Democrats have thrown a proverbial monkey wrench into Midterms

There Is No Leaker, Only A Desperate Democrat Ploy



There Is No Leaker, Only A Desperate Democrat Ploy“There is no Supreme Court leaker. (it was) purposely put out there to elect Democrats. SCOTUS is in on it.”-pundit Paul Bush,May 4, 2022) In CFP books, Paul Bush is spot-on. Any manhunt for a make-believe “leaker” will bring to light a ready made scapegoat, or turn up empty—until after Midterm Elections keep demonic Democrats in powerful control.
To a more tepid degree Leo Terrell on yesterday’s 'Fox & Friends’ was right when he said: the Supreme Court leaker has "changed the news cycle," distracting from President Biden's policies. The civil rights attorney said Democrats are "ecstatic" over the focus shifting off of inflation, Ukraine and crime.
LEO TERRELL: This to me was designed to change the current narrative away from the disastrous Biden administration. It's designed to focus on the midterm. It's designed to get people angry, emotional and it worked. We changed the news cycle. This leaker has changed the news cycle. The number one story is the leak. And the Democrats are ecstatic right now because the focus is off gas prices, inflation, the war in Ukraine, crime in the streets, critical race theory, all being distracted by the leaker.”
Lawyers are always so ever more cautious than pundits. We should have seen the shadow of the ‘leaker’ a little more than a month ago when the Democrats were toying with the idea of impeaching Justice Clarence Thomas. ‘Opinion | How to Impeach a Supreme Court Justice’-Kimberly Wehle, professor of law at the University of Baltimore School of Law, Politico, March 30, 2022)

Support Canada Free Press


“Revelations that Virginia Thomas exchanged at least 29 (known) text messages with former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, urging disruption of the November 2020 election results favoring President Joe Biden, have created a conflict-of-interest scandal surrounding the Supreme Court, where her husband Clarence Thomas is an associate justice. “Justice Thomas’ participation in multiple cases related to the outcome of the election, including his lone vote to prevent the Jan. 6 committee from accessing White House records relevant to its investigation of the riot at the Capitol, has led to calls for ethics reforms at the court — as well as his resignation. Given the unlikelihood of an admission of impropriety from Thomas, there is a more extreme avenue available to lawmakers who would seek to hold him accountable for compromising the neutrality and legitimacy of the court: impeachment. “Absent fuller facts as to Thomas’ potential involvement in his wife’s efforts, it’s too soon to tell whether impeachment is substantively warranted. After two failed attempts to convict former President Donald Trump on impeachment charges — not to mention former President Bill Clinton’s acquittal before that — impeachment as a remedy for malfeasance in office has become mostly obsolete. "Democrats in Congress are so far unwilling to venture down this politically fraught path, but the precedent exists, and it is worth studying as new damning details emerge about Virginia Thomas,’ who is known as Ginni, campaign to overturn the election.

Democrats need diversions to remain in power

“Over the country’s history, 15 federal judges have been impeached, and eight removed from office; others resigned in the wake of scandal instead. So one thing, at least, is clear: Unlike for presidents, there is ample precedent for firing federal judges via impeachment. Though no Supreme Court justice has ever been removed this way, there have been two attempts. Thomas is not immune to this constitutional remedy simply by virtue of sitting on the nation’s highest court. “Moreover, the standard governing judges’ removal is arguably lower than that for presidents. To be sure, Article I’s reference to “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” governs judges and presidents alike — as does the two-step procedure outlined in the Constitution, whereby articles of impeachment pass the House of Representatives on a bare majority vote, and conviction in the Senate occurs after trial by a two-thirds supermajority. The supermajority threshold ensures that Thomas would almost certainly never be removed from office, however ugly the facts are upon investigation, because it’s inconceivable Senate Republicans would vote against Thomas and give Biden another Supreme Court pick.”
Was it out of this mud and mire that a waiting-in-the-wings ‘leaker’ took birth? Knowing that their control over the masses stands to disappear in November elections, the Democrats are more than desperate. Democrat diversions to date will now take a back seat to the Supreme Court ‘leaker’, demonstrating how insincere they were about the atrocities happening in Ukraine. The ‘leaker’ is here as the biggest Democrat diversion of them all. With mainstream and social media help, It will suck the oxygen out of the air on all other issues—including the growing hunger of the masses they were elected to serve. Democrats need diversions to remain in power, and the newly spawned ‘leaker’ is the Mother of them all. The Democrats have thrown a proverbial monkey wrench into Midterms, and those hoping to protect the unborn and Save America will need prayers for a miracle to stop them in their tracks.


View Comments

Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives -- Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

Sponsored