Founded in 2010 as a voice for freedom in Canada’s courtrooms, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF’s) mission is to defend the constitutional freedoms of Canadians through litigation and education.
Most Recent Articles by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms:
“The Alexanders have already lost their jobs. They now face a separate professional regulatory process arising from the same events, with consequences that could extend to their ability to work as certified teachers in Ontario”
The warning letter states that the City and Hamilton Police deliberately used government power and influence to stifle political expression because they disagreed with its message;
Canadians are being told this is about keeping kids safe. What they are actually being offered is mandatory ID for adults, monitored AI conversations, and a speech referee with the power to fine companies into submission;
While we welcome the fact that the Township rescinded its unconstitutional prohibition on recording, it still maintained the trespass notices against Mr. Hill and Mr. Carther, which is, in itself, a constitutional violation;
This appeal raises important questions about the extent to which professional regulators may discipline members for lawful expression outside their professional practice;
Seek clarification from the Federal Court on the constitutional limits of mandatory census collection and the protection of personal privacy in an age of growing digital data retention;
“The application argues that people should not face imprisonment for entering areas that appear open to the public, especially where no signage, warning, or notice has been provided.”
I represented myself throughout the previous seven years of the Residential Tenancy and BC Human Rights Tribunal process, and am thoroughly exhausted by this seemingly biased process;
“By adding their names to this petition, Canadians entrusted us to carry their concerns directly to Ottawa and ensure that their voices are heard by the people elected to represent them.”
To protect privacy, freedom of expression, and personal autonomy in the digital age, Canadians should call on policymakers to reject government-controlled AI systems and oppose legislation that expands state access to private communications;
• Repudiate EDI and race-based laws and policies • Abolish the Indian Act • Repeal the Musqueam Agreement & avoid further ancestry-based land arrangements affecting private property • Uphold equality before the law
Seeking government censorship of a political leader’s public statements is an attack on the linchpin of Canada’s constitutional protection for free expression
The Western Standard will never intentionally lie to our readers to comply with a fictional right to not be offended. We will fight without compromise to protect the freedom of the press and freedom of speech against the censors;"
“I am accused of ‘hate speech’ and of breaching the BC Human Rights Code for challenging the concept of transgenderism and arguing that gender identity legislation harms women’s rights and safety, as well as youth;
A decision in this case could have wide-ranging implications for political expression across Ontario and Canada, particularly where governments seek to limit where and how citizens may communicate their views;
While we are glad that the Township has heeded our legal warning regarding the prohibition on recording, the trespass notices against Mr. Hill and Mr. Carther have not yet been rescinded;
If Canadians want to remain a free people, informed consent must remain non-negotiable. No one should ever face pressure, suggestion, or expectation that death is the answer to suffering, disability, poverty, or inadequate healthcare;
Today’s ruling is a significant victory for the rule of law and for the principle that governments are bound by limits, even in moments of political pressure;