Since 1992 we have seen, on numerous occasions, violations of the global human rights, all in the name of this Agenda. Through this Agenda, various governments, intent on the removal of their citizen’s rights, have been given the ability to say this is all for the sake of man-kind and/or the common good.[2] After all who would think that the UN would do anything to violate human rights, let alone create mandates, that would harm the various sovereign nations, particularly by means of the environment and climate change.
“The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.”[3]
This isn’t the first time the UN has seen the effects of 5 year plans.[4] In 1946-47 the UN initiated a mission, to the Ukraine/Russia, to investigate why Russian society was the way it was and why Russia was turning its back on the Western democracies it had been allied with during WWII. Those Five Year Plans involved similar removal of rights including the fundamental human right of survival. As expressed:
“There is no pretense, of course, of government by the people, nor any real understanding of what it means. The Communist regards “the non-party masses” as a herd of lazy, slow-witted, bearlike creatures, benumbed by centuries of serfdom, who have to be coaxed and chivvied along the road to The Perfect Society by the Party shepherds. The common man cannot be trusted to decide what is good for him, because he would almost surely want nothing more than a full belly, warm clothes, and a long nap on top of the brick stove. Certainly he is not farsighted enough to choose the bone-cracking labor and the endless self-denial which are demanded by the new series of Five Year Plans.
Public policy, therefore, must be left in the hands of the elite, who are specially trained to deal with such matters. The people are permitted to vote, because voting is one of the traditional trimmings of “democracy.”[5]
And while the UN and its affiliates have stated the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) are voluntary, what nation is going to be bullied and vilified, on the world stage, by not being in agreement, and/or implementing these unsustainable goals. One merely has to look at the present 17 UN SDGs (Agenda 2030), and the contradictions involved in those goals, to realize this seems to have very little to do with the protection of the environment or the changing climate and more to do with control executed by the signatories of the agreement and/or China’s prosperity through the UN.
In Canada we have the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and its “Green Municipal Fund” Five Year Plan[6] which may show how deeply these failed SDGs have reached into Canadian governance and society.
On the forefront, in Canada, is the use of the carbon taxes used to subject Canadians to financial hardship and an attempt to stop Canadians from using fossil fuels. This is laid out in the UN Sustainable Development reports. [7] People are having to decide whether to eat or heat and, it would seem, based on political push-back, the sitting government has had to carve out, at least one heat source, as their numbers are decreasing in the polls.[8] This does nothing for the survival of people using other heat sources and one merely has to look at the statements above to see this is the reality of many people – is this not a violation of basic human rights, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere? It seems the UN is the proxy for human rights violations and not some sovereign nations, doesn’t it?
To be continued in Part 4 of BREAK DOWN: The U.N., ICLEI & The China Solution…
