WhatFinger

Why did the EPA promulgate a benefit-less, job-killing regulation during the “nation’s difficult economic situation” in the first place?

EPA lectures Luminant on how to manage a power plant in tough economic times

By Steve Milloy ——--September 14, 2011

Global Warming-Energy-Environment | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Apparently tipped off to Luminant’s lawsuit filed Sep. 11 against EPA concerning the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, the EPA sent this obnoxious and condescending letter informing Luminant that shutting down mines is not the way to go in tough economic times.
The EPA lectured Luminant,
While making the business decision to close these mines may be one of several cost-effect ways to comply with the rule we do not believe it is the only path forward, particularly given the nation’s difficult economic situation.
Aside from the EPA’s temerity in advising Luminant on how to run its operations, why did the agency promulgate a benefit-less, job-killing regulation during the “nation’s difficult economic situation” in the first place?

Support Canada Free Press

Donate
Subscribe

View Comments
Steve Milloy——

Steve Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and GreenHellBlog.com and is the author of Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them

Older articles by Steve Milloy

VIEW Comments

Sponsored