It is rumored that our Divider-in-Chief is going to use the concept of ‘Income Inequality’ as a weapon to advance the status quo, establishment elites’ satanic agenda during his State of Disunion address. This concept is in violation of the 7th, 8th, and 10th Commandments (Catholic). The 7th Commandment says ‘You shall not steal’, the 8th Commandment says ‘You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor’, and the 10th Commandment says ‘You shall not covet your neighbor’s goods’. Is it any wonder why Catholicism, Christianity and Judaism are under attack by the gutless elites?
The premise to be promoted is that people’s wealth needs to be redistributed because income opportunities are unequal. Isn’t that part of the human condition, and what drives some people to seek solutions that benefit mankind? Yes, income opportunities are unequal, and let’s address some of the more egregious inequities!
Isn’t the real issue the fact that self-appointed elite puppeteers and their charlatan puppets in the White House, Congress and Supreme Court have bastardized our political and legislative systems into a system of crony collectivism and ‘monopolyism’? Isn’t it unfair that the charlatans in Congress are able to vote for their own raises, while holding those on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Tri-Care hostage to their malfeasance and whimsical voting? Isn’t it unfair that those in Congress can exempt themselves from laws they impose upon the rest of us? Isn’t it unfair that a President can subvert the law and Constitution, bypassing Congress, to impose an unconstitutional agenda upon an unsuspecting citizenry? Isn’t this what Bubba Clinton did when he circumvented Congress by signing an Executive Order in 1993 to impose the U. N. Agenda 21 upon us, after old man Bush signed us up for this U. N. agenda in 1992? How much of what has been done to date cost U. S. citizens in money and freedoms, and how much more will it cost us in money and freedoms, if it is fully deployed? On the flip side, how much has it secured the self-appointed elites in wealth and power?
Are you familiar with ‘The Office of the Attending Physician’? Has your Representative or either of your Senators ever mentioned this perk to you in correspondence, at a Town Hall meeting, or in campaign (franking) literature? This is a world-class healthcare perk, available to only the 535 members of Congress, the nine (9) members of Supreme Court, and five (5) muckety-mucks from Puerto Rico. This is in addition to the traditional healthcare to which those in Congress have access. Not all of these privileged few take advantage of this perk, but those who do pay a whopping $503.00 a year for it (2009). Can you guess who has the privilege of paying for the remaining costs for this perk? If you said ‘the U. S. taxpayer’, you go to the head of the class! Congress allocated just shy of $3.4 million of taxpayer money in 2013 to cover the costs of this perk. If ‘universal’ healthcare for U. S. citizens is the true agenda of the self-appointed elites, shouldn’t all of us have access to this type of healthcare?
Granted, not everyone currently in Congress was in office when the Democrats unilaterally rammed the Patient Abandonment and Un-affordable Care Act upon the electorate, but is it fair that members of Congress, and their staffs, have taxpayers paying 72% of their premiums? Based upon Obama’s paradigm, shouldn’t all of us have at least 72% of our premiums paid for by someone else? Of course, this would constitute a Ponzi scheme, but hey, who cares; let’s go a few more trillion in debt. Jack Lew can demand that the Maginot Line spending cap be increased, and everyone will be ecstatic! Isn’t that what ‘equity’ is all about?
‘60 Minutes’ can hardly be characterized as a right-leaning entity, but it recently unveiled the fact that Leadership PACs have become commonplace for members of Congress, even if a member isn’t in a leadership position. The money collected through these PACs is not limited for use in elections or conducting the business of the people. The monies can be used for just about anything, including supporting a Congressperson’s lifestyle. Shouldn’t all of us be able to panhandle with the wealthy so that we can achieve a comparable quality of life?
The STOCK act was a watered-down bill designed to make insider trading by members of Congress illegal. As weak as this legislation was, Congress surreptitiously weakened this law in 2013, and the puppeteer media was lax in informing the electorate about this sleight of legislation. Shouldn’t all of us have access to pending legislation so that we can generate unbridled wealth, with little to no risk? Have you read ‘Throw Them All Out’ by Peter Schweizer? You’ll need to put in a tooth protector to prevent you from grinding your teeth into dust, especially when you read about puff-face Kerry’s stock trades while he sat on the healthcare committee.
Are you wondering why the Keystone pipeline has not been approved? Aside from the wacko-bird greenies, could it be due to the fact that Warren Buffett’s railroad is moving much of the oil that would be transported through the pipeline? How much has this multi-billionaire made at the expense of the U. S. citizen and the environment? In fact, doesn’t the transportation of oil, via the railway, pose greater threats to our environment than via the pipeline? While we are discussing energy, how much have your utility costs gone up, due to the deployment of so-called ‘renewable’ energy? Isn’t the deployment of renewable energy regressive, stealing from those who can least afford it, even those who earn ‘good’ incomes?
If these abuses aren’t enough, how about former members of Congress becoming lobbyists, then glad-handing with their former colleagues for favorable legislation for the entities they represent. Most likely, these former Congressmen and women enjoy a lavish retirement, funded by taxpayers, in addition to cash-flowing significant incomes, made possible by their access to their former colleagues. Isn’t this regressivism inequitable?
Dare I discuss the excesses of [cough] the First Family? Where does one begin? Should we discuss the lavish vacations at the expense of taxpayers? How about all of the jet setting, in which a fundraising event is wedged into the itinerary so that the cost of travel is passed onto the taxpayer? Speaking of fundraising, how impactful and beneficial would it be, if the donors directed their money towards those less fortunate, in lieu of using their donations to support politicians who use the tax code to suck money from the ‘middle class’ to care for those less fortunate? Ironically, many of those within the middle class are double-dipped, because they give of their own free will, in addition to paying through the labyrinth of taxes imposed upon them by the elites. Considering the Obamas flying separately on vacations, how is this equitable, let alone economical, when compared to what the average citizen/taxpayer has access? The litany of abuses is so extensive, it rivals the unabridged version of ‘War and Peace’!
When considering income inequality, especially with this regime, how fair is it that big business is coddled, while small business is beset with draconian regulations and taxes? Obama says jobs are his first priority; I believe they are! He and his puppeteers seek to eliminate as many jobs as are possible, driving able-bodied and willing people to grovel for unemployment and food stamps. I’d say the elites’ agenda is being deployed rather well, wouldn’t you?
Speaking of taxes, isn’t it marvelous that politicians can be bought, so as to design the tax code to be used as a tool to widen the divide between the ultra-wealthy from the merely wealthy and middle class? Additionally, many political candidates wail about U. S. corporations moving operations outside of the U. S.; with the U. S. corporate tax being the highest in the world among industrialized nations, isn’t the outsourcing of American ingenuity and taxable income one of design by the elites?
Now we have the relative newcomer of largess (in name only) on the block, Common Core State Standards (CCSS)! Isn’t this legislated crony ‘monopolyism’ by self-appointed despots who see dollar signs with each of the 400 data points the elites seek to extract from each student? Isn’t this income inequality on a grand scale? While the average citizen/taxpayers’ children are hostage to this mutli-billion dollar scheme, what will the elites’ children be taught, and will their data points be used against them, as well? As for teachers and administrators, how many of them realize that technology will be used to replace many of them, once CCSS has been fully deployed? What will the newly unemployed do for income, once robots and audio/visual technologies replace them?
Of course, a key reason for the income inequality paradigm for the State of Disunion address is to provide cover for his cohorts in crime, the GOP establishment elite, to push amnesty in this Congressional session. This assault, along with ObamaCare now, appears to be a bipartisan effort against the U. S. citizenry. Never mind that this ‘policy’ is unconstitutional, unfair, and an affront to current U. S. citizens, without regard of these citizens’ heritage, be it native U. S. Indian, African, Mexican, Central and South American, Canadian, Asian, Chinese, Japanese, Philippine, Australian, New Zealand, Indian, Middle Eastern, Russian, European, or of somewhere else. Expected votes for politicians and cheap labor for fat-cat donors who contribute to those in leadership positions within both parties, usurp the constitution, and the rights and freedoms of those rightfully here. There appears to be no shame by those within the establishment elite puppets of both parties, and their puppeteer-controlled media cohorts. How sad is this reality?
The above issues comprise just the tip of the ‘iceberg’ of obvious inequalities imposed upon us by those within government, and their collectivism cronies in big business and the traditional media. As citizens and taxpayers, we have a right and a responsibility to demand better from those who profess to represent us and serve us, but who act as if they are out-of-the-water piranha, devouring our rights, freedoms and financial resources with impunity.
Fortunately, I have a meeting that conflicts with the timing of the Lying King’s address. We’ll be discussing religious freedom and actions to repel the Common Core assault. It is exciting to befriend and work with those who realize what is at stake, and have chosen to act decidedly and unselfishly. May God be with us, as we work to repel the grievous inequities imposed upon us by those, domestic and foreign, who seek to dominate us!
