WhatFinger

The damage done by 24 years of immigration and border deliberate non-enforcement may be very hard to repair

NATION UNDER SIEGE


By Mark Andrew Dwyer ——--September 12, 2016

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


Many of you, probably, have not noticed it, but the unarmed invasion of America by Muslim Arab hordes is on its way. Unlike the Latino-Mexican invasion by illegal "immigrants" from the South of the border, this one is not just encouraged and facilitated by the executive branch of our government; it is being orchestrated by it under the pretense of humanitarian relief and refugee resettlement. And it appears that of all the threats that we have ever faced in our country's history, this one is going to become the gravest threat to our ownership of the Republic that we and our ancestors have built. Although they are coming here as the "refugees", they look like anything but the refugees. Well dressed, well fed, assertively imposing themselves and their failed theocratic system on Americans, they talk, walk, and act like presumptive future rulers of this country. Two main destinations of the current wave of the invasion are Michigan and California. Michigan already has strong beachheads formed by the previous waves of Muslim immigration. In several localities in Michigan, Muslim immigrants have already an upper hand in the power struggle with non-Muslim Americans. In some cases, those immigrants are beginning to force the natives out unless the latter surrender to the Islamic new order that the former have brought with them to America.
In California, the emergence of visible Muslim-Arab blocs is a relatively new phenomenon. For some, who notice it, it is shocking to see numerous groups of Muslim Arabs congregating in some of the most desirable and affluent areas of coastal California (no, Madam Albright, the "refugees" are not going to settle in all those unpopulated, less desirable areas that you saw a plenty from the airplane) and behaving like if they owned the place, with not much regard to the etiquette of self-constrain and good manners that most of Americans there do follow. To others, "multi-cultural" California, whose white majority was recently reduced to a minority status by anti-white preferences and migration (euphemistically referred to as the "demographic change"), is a logical choice for injecting a large numbers of prolific aliens who gained notoriety for their hereditary resistance against assimilation to the mainstream American culture. Judging from Europe's bad experience with mass immigration from predominantly Muslim countries, it does not take an Einstein to predict what is going to happen once millions of fleeing "refugees" from Syria, Libya, and other Arab countries settle on America's shores. Those who have landed here may certainly appreciate the unexpected, if not undeserved, windfall that was bestowed on them, and may even may harbor a sense of gratitude towards America for the generosity of our government. Their American-born children and grandchildren will have no such appreciation, though. They will take for granted the privilege of living in America, and will compare themselves, their living standards and the level of economic success, not to their ex-compatriots in Middle East but to the mainstream Americans. Many of second- and third-generation immigrants will not acquire knowledge and skills that are necessary for successful professional careers and will be stuck with low-paying jobs and handouts that do not suffice for a membership in the American middle class. And not surprisingly so; the societies that their ancestors built were primitive and unproductive on Western standards, and that was mostly the result of their members' relative low creativity and productivity, as well as propensity to rebel and to destruct in the name of a flimsy cause.

Those maladaptive traits will not go away easily (after all, Muslim and Arabs are known for sticking to their "traditions"), so what they and their ancestors accomplished there is to large extent indicative of what their offspring will be capable of achieving here. This, particularly when coupled with their proverbial fertility, will give rise to emergence and growth of assertive and rebellious underclass that, to make things more grave, is likely to become the electoral majority in a not-so-distant future. And then, God have a mercy on us all who will be still alive when America reaches that point. As Ann Coulter aptly noticed, they will turn our country into a hellhole similar to those that they emigrated from. For those who still give them an undue benefit of doubt, just look at what some of them are doing in France: riots, burnings, destruction, and excessive breeding are among the contributions of second and third generation of Middle Eastern immigrants to that once gentle and civilized nation. Arab's logic is predatory, and has been for some 13 hundred years, now. When they were in their countries, walking on the oil fields that had more oil that they could ever use, we had to pay through the nose for "their" goods that they never had to work for. But when they come to our country and want to take the undeserved advantage of the fruits of our hard work, then - all the sudden - the song is that we need to share with them what we have produced. And that's a typical logic of the predator, indeed. Some say that we are supposed to give away fruits of our work to blacks as a sort of entitlement, ostensibly, because of past discrimination and slavery that virtually none of us (not even the ancestors of many of us) has anything to do with. But why do we owe anything to Arabs? America did not enslave them or discriminate against them. On the contrary, they were the ones that in medieval ages gained notoriety for enslaving millions of people, many of them of European extraction. Bringing to America assertive and quickly multiplying Muslim Arabs is an act of treason against the American people. If you question that then tell me how different it is from opening the gates for invading army? Why did our ancestors fight for their and our freedom from British rule if massively-imported quickly-multiplying Arabs are going to rule over us once they reach the electoral majority? It is like submitting us to the hostile foreign power, again. So, it is an act of treason, indeed. It makes sense at this point to reflect upon who deserves the guilt for making our country a target of the Muslim Arab invasion.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate

These are Barrack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the ruling clique who own the Syrian and Libyan crises, as they were the ones who, by their naive (Obama, Clinton, and - to some extent - "W" Bush) or selfish (the ruling clique) actions destabilized political status quo in the region and financed toppling of Libya's dictator, Muammar Gaddafi (as of time of this writing, Syria's President, Bashar al-Assad is still resisting this administration's efforts to dispose of him). Those actions turned out very damaging not only to Libya and Syria, but also to America. For starters, U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was killed in Benghazi during his mission to deliver material support to one of the fighting factions of anti-al-Assad rebels. (Interestingly, Joe Biden did not comment after that fact that al-Qaeda is alive and the U.S. Ambassador is dead.) Now, thousands of Muslim Arab "refugees" are about to wreck America as if we, the American people, should be punished for the actions of our incompetent, if not reckless, government. Unbelievably, in her fallacious mind, Clinton, who was one of the engineers of that crisis of Biblical proportions and even got caught lying in her blatant attempt to cover-up the real reasons of Ambassador Stevens' trip to Benghazi and his assassination there (she blamed everything on an Internet video), now claims that being a vital part of the administration that created that disaster proves her qualifications for the office of the U.S. President. Here are some conclusions. Every time you vote for a Democrat, no matter how decent and well-meaning she may be, you drive another nail in the coffin of America. A Democrat will, eventually, abandon her ethical constrains and end up voting his party line. And for several decades now, that line has been increasingly anti-American, a line of attack on American Republic, the liberties of its people, and prosperity and happiness of the majority of Americans. The Democrat Party has become one of the main instruments in the hands the hostile trans-national ruling clique with which to take over our once free country, by means of mass importation of quickly-multiplying unassimilating future - presumably Democrat - voters that the clique thinks it can control. Not that GOP does not have its neocons, sellouts, and impostors (a.k.a. RINOs), but it still shows some promise to side, every now and then, with normal Americans and not with our enemies and invaders. After all, the GOP nominee, Donald Trump, appears like a sincere American patriot, as opposed to the recent Democrat presidents and hopefuls. It is hard to predict what is going to happen after Trump wins, if he does. The damage done by 24 years of immigration and border deliberate non-enforcement may be very hard to repair. But if Trump loses it will almost certainly spell out the end of America as we know her. And what happens on November 8, 2016, will be decided if and how YOU vote.

Subscribe

View Comments

Mark Andrew Dwyer——

Mr. Dwyer has been a continuing contributor to the Federal Observer. Mark Andrew Dwyer’s commentaries (updated frequently) can be found here. Send your comments to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Sponsored