By Steve Milloy ——Bio and Archives--January 28, 2011
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
While we have high hopes that the newly empowered Republican Members of Congress will make every effort to fight the socialization of America, we are also aware that the GOP has an ignominious history of wimping- and/or selling-out, especially on environmental issues. Wimp & Sellout Watch is GreenHellBlog’s effort to spotlight the GOP’s weak links because:In the 112th Congress, it should take more courage for GOP-ers to retreat than to advance.
... while publicly calling for a more permanent approach [to EPA regulation, ... Fred Upton] would support a two-year delay. “He takes it and act [sic] like it’s medicine but really he’s happy because the last thing he wants to do is have a 2012 campaign where this is an overhang.”The source of this comment, according to CCN, is an aide to Sen Lisa Murkowski. If this comment is accurate, then Upton only sees the EPA controversy as a potential personal political problem, not the threat to our economy and standard of living that it is. According to the CCN report, Murkowski believes a two-year delay in EPA regulation is too little and too late because she...
... is concerned that simply revoking EPA’s GHG authority might not be enough to address states that have changed laws or revised Clean Air Act state implementation plans (SIPs) to implement EPA GHG rules. Further, EPA has issued federal implementation plans (FIPs) to take over GHG permitting in several states. Both SIPs and FIPs are federally enforceable under the Clean Air Act and their requirements have been upheld by judges even if other laws or rules contained differing requirements.Sen. Rand Paul. Politico reported today that,
Paul so far is at least keeping his powder dry on a “clean energy standard” that Obama highlighted in his State of the Union Tuesday night. Obama called for 80 percent of U.S. electricity to come from “clean energy” sources by 2035 – including traditional renewable sources like wind and solar but also natural gas and Republican favorites nuclear and “clean coal.” “I need to see more about it frankly before I can comment on it,” Paul said Thursday. “Let’s think about it and look at the specific proposal.”We didn't know that Rand Paul needed to "see more" about energy rent-seeking to oppose it. What kind of libertarian is he? Is Washington D.C. house-breaking him? Sen. Rob Portman. Portman made Wimp & Sellout Watch — No.2 because of concerns for his "moderate" tendencies and his close friendship with anti-nuclear NRDC activist Dan Reicher. Politico reported today that,
A Portman spokesman said in an email that he wanted to be on the energy panel “because of the potential OH jobs tied to commonsense energy legislation that would spur growth in nuclear energy … clean coal, and natural gas production.”Not only is "clean coal" a pipedream, it implies the demonization of carbon dioxide emissions, carbon caps and rent-seeking. Don't forget to check out previous editions of Wimp & Sellout Watch:
Support Canada Free Press
View Comments
Steve Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and GreenHellBlog.com and is the author of Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them