Once again, the New Messiah is seeking to smite his enemies, this time with a “Domestic Extremism Lexicon”-a dictionary calling pro-life people violent and racist.
According to an article in Lifenews:http://www.lifenews.com/nat5019.html
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — More details are emerging about a terrorism dictionary the administration of President Barack Obama put together in March. The newly-revealed document comes on the heels of a report the Department of Homeland Security sent out saying pro-life advocates were right-wing extremists.
The latest report to cause national outrage is a document known as the “Domestic Extremism Lexicon,” essentially a terrorism and political extremism dictionary for the Obama administration’s internal use.
The March 26, 2009 document features numerous definitions and the headline “antiabortion extremism,” appears on page two of the eleven-page manual.
The Obama administration calls pro-life advocates violent and claims they employ racist overtones in engaging in criminal actions.
The definition reads: “A movement of groups or individuals who are virulently antiabortion and advocate violence against providers of abortion-related services, their employees, and their facilities. Some cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities.”
A Washington Times report indicates the terrorism dictionary was recalled within hours after the Obama administration released it.
Amy Kudwa, Homeland Security spokeswoman, told the newspaper the dictionary “was not an authorized I&A product, and it was recalled as soon as management discovered it had been released without authorization.”
Although she said the dictionary “is not, nor was it ever, in operational use,” Kudwa did not appear to dispute its existence or that the Obama administration compiled it.”
end excerpt
Now, abortion is itself violent and inherently racist. What could be more violent than to reach into a woman`s womb with forceps and tear a sleeping baby apart, removing the poor child`s body piece by piece? A serial killer who would do something similar to a child would be considered the most monstrous of villains, yet if a doctor does it to a consenting 13 year old girl`s child it is a “proceedure”. And racist?
Margaret Sanger and her accessories at Planned Parenthood wanted legalized abortion for the purposes of Eugenics-to eliminate the “mud races” who, in Sanger`s twisted little mind, were befouling her pristine gene pool. The solution of racists like Sanger was forced sterilization, quarantine of “degenerates” and forced abortion, and the ultimate goal was to eliminate minorities such as African Americans, Native Americans, and Jews.
In the United States, black women make up 12.3% of the female population but account for 35% of all abortions, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta. Hispanic women make up 12.5% of the female population but account for 22% of abortions. White women, with 62.6% of the population, account for just 34% of abortions. Doesn`t this disproportionality suggest an inherently racist institution? Imagine if, instead of abortions, we were talking about mortality rates from, say, influenza; the outcry from Liberals would be deafening! In point of fact, we hear such an outcry about the percentages of whites to blacks in the prison population, and this after criminals have had a trial by a jury of their peers (and, of course, the prisoners will eventually be released and can be released). Consider the outcry about the inequity of the death penalty. Yet there is a deafening silence in regards to the inherent racism of abortion.
Martin Luther King`s daughter Alveda has become a staunch opponent of abortion, and had this to say about the matter:
“[Martin Luther King, Jr.] once said, “The Negro cannot win as long as he is willing to sacrifice the lives of his children for comfort and safety.” How can the “Dream: survive if we murder the children? Every aborted baby is like a slave in the womb of his or her mother. The mother decides his or her fate.”
There never was a slave as powerless as an unborn child, it should be duly noted.
Yet according to Mr. Obama`s Administration, it is the opponent of what is an utterly abhorrent practice who is the violent one, the racist.
This is illustrative of a utilitarian mindset toward human beings, and suggests that Mr. Obama holds common cause with radical atheists who view human beings as mere animals, subject to the intellectual whims of the intelligentsia. One could not hold, as does Obama, that partial birth abortion (where the baby is delivered except for the head, and a forceps is jammed into the base of the baby`s skull) is a legitimate practice, or that, when an abortion is botched and a baby is born alive, it can be tossed onto a table and allowed to die of exposure-as Obama seems to have little problem with also. Anyone who thinks these practices are acceptable does not see inherent dignity and worth in a human being but rather sees them as meat animated by neurochemical processes only. A result of carelessness on the part of the parents and blind biological processes which deliver a creature enslaved to its genetic, neurological, and cultural heritage, it holds no worth outside of that which society bestows upon it. Since it was not preplanned or poses some inconvenience, it has no inherent right to exist, hence can be killed as easily as one would slap a mosquito buzzing in one`s ear.
This is also illustrative of a hatred for conservatives of all stripes, and a desire to impose Mr. Obama`s will through force.
How many more examples are needed for the American public to understand? This administration has followed a path more fitting to Benito Mussolini (who, interestingly enough, called himself Il-Duce, or number one, much like Obama called himself and his cadre “the ones we have been waiting for”-he clearly sees himself as Il-Duce.)
Consider the Department of Homeland Security report suggesting that Second Amendment advocates, Christians, Ron Paul supporters, Pro-Lifers, and other such conservative types were potential terrorists to be treated with extreme caution. Consider Obama`s call for an internal secret police (to be under his direct control and funded as heavily as the U.S. Army or Navy). Consider his expansion of Americorp, and his expressed desire to make it a required “volunteerism” much like Adolph Hitler had his Youths “volunteer” to serve Nazism. Consider his seizing control of the U.S. Census, placing it in the hands of the corrupt vote-stealing ACORN to cement himself in power. Consider his takeover of the banks and auto industry, and his refusal to allow the banks to pay back the TARP money so he can maintain control. Consider his plan to convert the stock ceded to the government by the banks into common stock, thus giving control of the nation`s wealth to the U.S. government. Consider his Cosa Nostra-esque scheme to convert the government`s minority shares in the auto industry into majority control, and to give a large percentage to his loyal brownshirts in the UAW. Consider the national DNA database that he`s building without the consent of parents (see national DNA base), something that could be used for Eugenics. Consider the use of our satellite systems to spy on Americans as part of the Census Bureau`s efforts to “count every American (see Big Brother GPS Doorway Census). This guy skipped the hockey pokey at his wedding in favor of the goose step!
But that is a natural consequence of a worldview that sees human beings as mere objects. Obama and the materialist Liberals talk a good game about caring for the poor and disenfranchised, but that care is only a means to an end, that end being the imposition of state power over all aspects of the human condition. It is more a compassion of control, a desire to remake Mankind in much the same manner as Obama means to do “the work of remaking America”. Man to the Left is perfectible, given the right stimuli. Human beings are ultimately enslaved by conditions around them, lacking any free will except in the most illusory sense. But Humanity as a collective-and the intellectuals who have seen beyond the chains imposed by evolution and history-can perhaps mold an all-too malleable reality, thus reshaping the perceptual reality to create the “new Man” dreamed of by Karl Marx and other Leftist Utopians. Obama is just the latest sucker to buy into this pipe dream.
In short, this is a vision of Man as god, the shaper of all things. Having done their best to murder the Most High, the materialists have happily placed themselves on the throne. The One, the New Messiah, may be pejorative terms imposed by the Right, but they aren`t far from the mark in terms of what he and his friends ultimately believe.
I wrote about this very thing at the American Thinker when the Terri Schiavo case was raging, and my point is still germaine; the power of death is the key to equality with God to the Left. Man cannot give life, but he can surely mete out death, and a Barack Obama will fight to the end to keep abortion “safe and legal” to thus ensure that right, or rather, that usurpation. It should come as no surprise that the Obama Administration would call people fighting to save lives violent and racist.
If that is what they really believe, isn`t it incumbent upon them to utilize whatever power they possess to destroy these violent racists? Not only is it not inconceivable, it is in fact a moral imperative that they do so.
That is how Hitler thought. That was how Mussolini thought, Joseph Stalin thought, Mao Tse-Tung thought, Pol Pot thought. To believe what this Administration believes, action is necessary, or these are the BIGGEST hypocrites in history. That action will come, perhaps not with stormtroopers in the night, but certainly with laws and novel interpretations. There has to be action taken at some point.
The Administration has the power of the state behind them. Obama`s position on abortion is illustrative of a mentality that sees people as matters of convenience; you do the math!
Oh, and don`t forget; he called us “bitter Americans clinging to our guns and religion”. There are some who would say “you`ll take my guns from me when you can pry it from my cold, dead hands.” Perhaps that could be arranged?
