The Pot Calling the Kettle Black

Twice now Barrack Hussein Obama has dumped on the city of Las Vegas as a place to avoid spending money in. Obama, a man of mixed parentage, has no problem at all in hiding behind his physical appearance when he deposits his size 12 into his mouth. Neither is he, nor his supporters, at all slow when it comes to dispensing racist remarks against those who disagree with him. And, as is typical, the Democrat leadership in Nevada suddenly found themselves muzzled because there seems to be an unwritten commandment within the liberal hierarchy; “Thou shalt not criticize the black president,” even when he is bankrupting your state.

---

Within one of the predominantly black areas of Las Vegas there is a facility called the Doolittle Community Center. It is similar to those community activist and organizing storefronts Obama worked out of when he was developing his Marxist connections. Just like in Obama's Chicago, the people who frequent the Doolittle center have a tendency to gravitate toward the extreme left quadrant of the political spectrum. Within that quadrant you will find political positions and opinions that want no logical interferences such as common sense to confuse the issue. There you will find support for the claim that vaccines have been developed to eradicate the black race, that George Bush caused Hurricane Katrina to strike New Orleans for the purpose of killing blacks, and that insisting that individuals be personally responsible for the consequences of their actions is somehow a racist position. This is where the Mayor of Las Vegas, Oscar Goodman comes in. Mayor Goodman’s sin was in saying that because he has now twice defamed the Mayor's beloved city, Obama was not welcome in Las Vegas and that Goodman would not welcome the President when he comes to Las Vegas to stump for Harry Reid. That was enough for the calls of racism to begin flying out of the Doolittle Center. Even Harvey Mumford, a 7 foot tall black Nevada State Assemblyman with an overwhelming love of bananas, joined in the criticism of the Mayor, saying Goodman owed Obama an apology. You can find a very slanted and incomplete story on the incident here: What is not so surprising is that nearly every one of those shouting shame at the mayor were his supporters back when he ran as a Democrat. Now that Goodman is registered as an Independent he is a traitor and is therefore no longer allowed to voice an opinion. Goodman’s history in the area is long, going back several decades. As a lawyer he has worked thousands of hours in pro bono for every race imaginable. Nowhere can a single incident in the Mayor’s background even approaching racism be found, but voicing an opinion contrary to the steadfast liberal belief that Obama is somehow above all human foibles is treated as blasphemy. The Democrat Party loves to use situational politics where the first amendment is concerned. They seem to have forgotten that the Sedition Act was repealed in 1800 and President Wilson’s attempt to revive it during the First World War did no better. Remember, Wilson’s progressive policies were credited by the founders of Nazi Germany as a key component in their dismantling post war Germany’s democratic republic. So why do liberals keep leaning toward favoring the policies Hitler found attractive? And why do they use the term Nazi in describing those who disagree with those very policies? Far too many times has the First Amendment been not only ignored by the liberal left, but under their steady, unrelenting attack its meaning has been corrupted to the point that a fundamental interpretation of that short foundational paragraph is now called un-American. That brings us back to the issue of any criticism of Barrack Hussein Obama being viewed as inherently racist. Since getting involved into the world of politics, I have had several opportunities to see the world behind the black activist rhetoric. It is not a pretty one. Young black men are taught to treat women as if they were nothing more than servants and playthings. By example they are shown that the mark of a real man is through fathering as many children out of wedlock with as many different women as possible. They are taught that being good in school is somehow “acting white,” and that if anyone not of their race is offended at any of the antisocial things they might do, that offense is obviously racist at its core. Young black women are taught to be both submissive to the young thugs who abuse them and abusively defiant to any non-black authority figure, especially teachers. They are taught that their only reliable career path must include being sexually promiscuous and that the idea of having a traditional father-mother-children family life is a white thing. It is no wonder that the one demographic in the United States at the top of every negative cultural and societal factor is the black. The truly sad fact is that it does not have to be that way. That paragraph above will be attacked as being virulently racist both because it is critical of a destructive culture and because I do not have the proper skin color to write that opinion. Even though Bill Cosby has written much the same, and in fact used harsher terminology, to the Barack Hussein Obama worshipers out there, this column contains nothing but vile hatred against the whole of the black race. I have a real problem with that and so would most of the historical figures the American Blacks revere, that is, if they were able to read their own history. If you bother to talk to any of the students at schools in East or West Africa, you will not hear a single mangled word or sentence. They exude a love of learning and of manners that shames most of us in the United States. Just by this one world example it is obvious that the problem within the black American community is not genetic, it is cultural. The color of a person's skin and the shape of their face have nothing whatsoever to do with their intelligence. Stupidity is taught, not grown. I doubt one of those at the Doolittle Community Center has even bothered to think that their visceral gut reaction to call Mayor Goodman’s offence at Obama’s words racist was in itself a form of racism. And yet that is the very definition of the word. It takes a lot of work and it takes a lot of patience to overcome deep seated hatreds. Being able to judge someone by “who” rather than “what” they are is not the work of a few moments or even a weekend at a so-called diversity retreat. In fact, most of the government mandated diversity programs are in themselves racist against the inappropriately assumed majority. As it turns out, this current administration in Washington may in fact be one of the most, if not the most racist administration this country has ever seen. Can anyone quote any President other than Barack Obama that has uttered more racist remarks in both press conferences and campaign speeches? It seems to me that rather than owing Obama an apology, Mayor Oscar Goodman is owed a whole boatload of apologies.