Hardly ever does a day go by without some form of disparagement being uttered by a liberal Democrat regarding our stately and rock-solid Constitution. It is the stout character and survivability of that internationally revered document that those left-wing cretins just can't stomach. They wish to all their supposed deities for it to fail or be found to be incompetent; but alas, poor Yorick, it still stands tall.
Were the Constitution found to be lacking, a great screech of unbounded joy would ring out of the current personnel now usurping our White House; they could run roughshod over all formalities and legal documents and doctrines in their efforts to hand us over to a third world entity with corrupt leaders such as the unscrupulous United Nations.
The very astute and redoubtable David Limbaugh wrote in the GOP/USA 'The Eagle' on January 4, 2011 an article titled, "Is the Constitution Senile? Commentary" on gopusa.com, which outlined the move made by the new congressional Republicans' brilliant decision to actually read the entire Constitution aloud on the floor of the Congress on opening day.
On that occasion, it seemed that just about all the Reps, R's and D's took part in the process, each speaking one section of the quite simple for such an auspicious and enduring document. Even little Nancy, who was the third in line to emote, which she did like a well schooled fifth grader who had memorized her few lines in the school play. She did it in rapid fire mode and I half expected to see her curtsy and rush back to her seat when she finished.
In the past two years, the liberal Democrats have proven that they either have no knowledge of the contents of this distinguished document that was the base for their swearing in ceremony when each of them first became Congressmen; or they have no loyalty to adhere to its rulings and guidance. Frankly, we all know it is the latter of those two as is shown by the largely anti-American legislation that favors not the people of the United States but only certain designated and chosen sections that are partial to those same liberal Democrats.
Limbaugh wrote of two Washington Post blogger/writers, Ezra Klein and E. J. Dionne providing input for the discussion on the constitutional reading, Klein calling it a "gimmick" and saying "it was written more than 100 years ago" showing a bit of uncertainty himself about the document that was signed and adopted in 1787 some 224 years ago.
Dionne "expressed similar irreverence for our founding document" Limbaugh stated, by lamenting "that the tea party movement has treated the Constitution 'as the equivalent of sacred scripture.'"
Limbaugh went on to say that those "assessment(s) are quite a far cry from that of former British Prime Minister William Gladstone, who observed, "The American Constitution is, so far as I can see, the most wonderful work ever struck off at a given time by the brain and purpose of man."
This is why Ezra Klein and E. J. Dionne Washington Post writers try to denigrate the Constitution to any extent possible; because it is so RIGHT and I don't mean that in the political sense as compared to their LEFTness. No, those two followers of socio-communist beliefs just don't like the fairness and correctness of our Constitution; they would rather see it an even more jumbled mess than they normally describe it, if only to make their point that it is a faulty document.
If ever they could get their heads screwed on properly they might be able to see the plausibility of that wonderful document that has been held up as a model of completeness by noted scholars and statesmen from around the globe.
The left would like to be able to interpret it on an occasion-by-occasion basis and mold it to say what they would have it say had they themselves written it. In other words, let it state what is in their bigoted and warped brains for any given situation; not a case of one rule fits all, but a case of one rule means to be changed to whatever they have in mind for that occasion. Typically left-wing cheating to make something fit that otherwise would never be acceptable. Like the liberal interpretation of the word bipartisanship to mean, "Do it our way."
Gerald A. “Jerry” McConnell, 92, of Hampton, died Sunday, February 19, 2017, at the Merrimack Valley Hospice House in Haverhill, Mass., surrounded by his loved ones. He was born May 27, 1924 in Altoona, Pa., the fifth son of the late John E. and Grace (Fletcher) McConnell.
Jerry served ten years with the US Marine Corps and participated in the landing against Japanese Army on Guadalcanal and another ten years with the US Air Force. After moving to Hampton in 1957 he started his community activities serving in many capacities.
He shared 72 years of marriage with his wife Betty P. (Hamilton) McConnell. In addition to his wife, family members include nieces and nephews.
