WhatFinger

Enacting same-sex marriage would not expand the institution of marriage but redefine it

Supreme Court Decision Will Lead to Gay Marriage in Five States. Why That’s Wrong


By Heritage Foundation Ryan T. Anderson——--October 6, 2014

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


Today the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review appeals from Utah, Oklahoma, Virginia, Indiana and Wisconsin on the definition of marriage. This means that lower court rulings that struck down state marriage laws now will go into effect, forcing the redefinition of marriage in these states and potentially in other states in the 4th, 7th, and 10th circuits.

This is an unfortunate setback for sound constitutional self-government and a setback for a healthy marriage culture. The truth of the matter is that the marriage laws in these five states—as in many states across our nation—are good laws that reflect the truth about marriage. Frequently they were passed with overwhelming democratic support. The Supreme Court should have reviewed these cases and should have upheld the authority of citizens and their elected representatives to make good marriage policy. Instead, the Supreme Court left standing bad rulings from lower federal courts that usurped authority from the people by striking down good laws. More...

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Heritage Foundation——

The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with more than 453,000 individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973,  mission is
to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.


Sponsored