WhatFinger

“#” is what Morgan does best because he’s a world class wuss

The Paris killers are Islamic terrorists, not thugs, Piers Morgan


By Judi McLeod ——--January 10, 2015

Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


Adding to the pain of the horrific terrorist attacks in Paris, are the exploitive spins of lib-left wags, who, among their other cunning tactics, come right out and call the site of the first massacre “Charlie Hebdo’s” but gloss over the name Hyper Cacher as “a kosher market”.
Nowhere on--or even near the scene--when the the Islamic terrorists struck, left-wing scribes are coming in droves out of the woodwork in the safety of the aftermath. Prissy Piers Morgan’s take on the Islamic terrorist attack at Charlie Hebdo’s is a glaring example of how many scribes of the day, here and abroad, just don’t get it. Not even today’s headline ‘If I can accept that the Paris murderers aren’t real Muslims why won’t the MUSLIM world say so too? can top the December 2012 headline: Deport me? If America won't change its crazy gun laws... I may deport myself says PIERS MORGAN”. To Morgan, “It’s not a religious war, as the cowardly, murderous thugs carrying out these atrocities would have us believe.” (Daily Mail, Jan. 9, 2015) Even the great unwashed to whom Morgan addresses his lectures not only recognize the vast difference between thugs and terrorists, they can also tell them apart. Generally speaking, a thug is the creep who hangs out on the street corner waiting to relieve an unsuspecting old lady of her purse. A terrorist is Cherif and Said Kouachi, who snuffed the lives of cartoonists and journalists at Charlie Hebdo’s in the pious pretense of “avenging the prophet”, and their Muslim Brother hostage taker Amedy Coulibaly and his still at large common law wife, Hayat Boumeddiene, who killed four hostages in an act of terror at the leftwing media’s hard-to-say KOSHER Hyper Cacher.

Personal experience is mostly what qualifies Morgan to pontificate on issues, whether it’s radical Islamic terrorism or America’s Second Amendment. In the case of the terrorist attacks in Paris:
“...As a journalist for 30 years, and someone whose wife was born and raised in Paris, I feel particularly incensed by what’s just happened in that wonderful city to so many fellow journalists and Parisians. “I’m no great advocate for the kind of savage satirical stuff Charlie Hebdo used to pump out. Some of it was funny, some plain nasty. “But they were a non-discriminatory offender, everyone copped it.”
In the case of the Second Amendment:
“...Well, I do know a bit about guns, actually. My brother’s a lieutenant colonel in the British Army and has served tours of duty in Northern Ireland, the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan. My sister married a colonel who trained Princes William and Harry at Sandhurst. My uncle was a major in the Green Howards.”
Bully for Morgan. Or is it Bully Morgan? Not once in his latest screed does Morgan make mention of the Gendarmes having to respond to the slaughter at Charlie Hebdo’s with only billy sticks and no guns, arriving at the scene of carnage on bicycles because government edict long ago left the gendarmes unarmed in Muslim-endangered Paris. Just like his bosses, Morgan, a product of the snooty, leftwing British mainstream media, pretends not to be aware of the January 1st statement of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sissi. Why let truth get in his way when he can do what he’s made a career out of: dissing America in bitter Barack Obama-like style: “Every Drone strike that strays and kills innocent civilians in the Middle East acts as a perfect recruiting agent for hundreds, if not thousands more vengeful members of the Islamic State,” Morgan writes.
“Every day that Guantanamo Bay stays open, keeping people prisoner without charge or trial for years on end, is used as a perfectly justifiable example of America acting as just the same repressive, inhumane, law-flouting regime that it professes to abhor.”
What about the Guantanamo Bay suspected 9/11 masterminds being released on a terrorist-challenged world by Obama? The best proof positive of Morgan’s remaining out-of-touch-with-the-real-world 101 comes in the following posit: “I want to hear the leaders of predominantly Muslim countries, like Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, come out and condemn these murderous bastards, without equivocation.” The remarkably courageous president of Egypt did exactly that on New Year’s Day, Mr. Morgan. Problem is, you and your ilk pretended not to hear him.
“On New Year’s Day, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sissi—the hero of Egypt’s 2013 anti-Muslim Brotherhood revolution—made some remarkable comments concerning the need for a “religious revolution.” (Raymond Ibrahim  January 8, 2015) Watch the video below or click here to read the excerpt: “Sisi made his remarks during a speech celebrating the birth of Islam’s Prophet Muhammad—which was ironically held on January 1, 2015 (a day not acknowledged or celebrated in the Muslim world as it is based on a Christian calendar)—and he was addressing the nation’s top Islamic authorities from among the Awqaf Ministry (religious endowments) and Al Azhar University. “Although Sisi’s words were directed to Islam’s guardians and articulators, they indirectly lead to several important lessons for Western observers. “First, in just a few words, Sisi delivered a dose of truth and hard-hitting reality concerning the Islamic world’s relationship to the rest of the world—a dose of reality very few Western leaders dare think let alone proclaim. “It’s inconceivable,” he said, “that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire umma [Islamic world] to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible!” “What a refreshingly honest statement to come from not only a political leader but a Muslim political leader who has much to lose, not least his life! Contrast his very true words with the habitual reassurances of the Western establishment that Islamic world violence and intolerance is a product of anything and everything but Islam. “Even after the appearance of the head-chopping, infidel-crucifying Islamic State, politicians like U.S. President Obama and U.K. Prime Minister Cameron insisted that the “caliphate” is not Islamic, despite all the evidence otherwise. Yet here is Sisi, the pious Muslim, saying that the majority of the terrorism plaguing the world today is related to the holy texts of Islam themselves: ”That thinking [that is responsible for producing “anxiety, danger, killing and destruction” around the world]—I am not saying “religion” but “thinking”—that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the centuries, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world. It’s antagonizing the entire world! “As a Muslim, Sisi will not say that Islam, the “religion,” is responsible for “antagonizing the entire world,” but he certainly goes much further than his Western counterparts when he says that this “thinking” is rooted in an Islamic “corpus of texts and ideas” which have become so “sacralized.” “Recall that here in the West, Islamic terrorists are seen as mere “criminals” and their terrorism as “crimes” without mention of any Islamic text or ideology driving them. “The Egyptian president further invoked the classical Islamic teaching—the “thinking”—that divides the world into two warring halves: the Muslim world (or in Islamic/Arabic parlance, Dar al-Islam) which must forever be in a struggle with the rest of the world (or Dar al-Harb, the “abode of war”) till, in the Koran’s words, “all religion belongs to Allah” (Koran 8:39). “Is it possible,” asked Sisi, “that 1.6 billion people should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants—that is 7 billion—so that they themselves may live?” “Sisi made another important point that Western leaders and media habitually lie about: after affirming that Islamic “thinking” is “antagonizing the entire world,” he said that “this ummaisbeing torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost—and it is being lost by our own hands.” “In other words, Islamic terrorism and chaos is not a product of grievance, territorial disputes, colonialism, Israel, offensive cartoons, or anything else the West points to. It’s a product of their “own hands.” “Again, one must appreciate how refreshing it is for a top political leader in the heart of the Islamic world to make such candid admissions that his Western counterparts dare not even think let alone speak. And bear in mind, Sisi has much to lose as opposed to Western politicians. Calls by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists that he is an apostate are sure to grow more aggressive now.”
It takes someone with the stones of an al Sisi to face the truth and speak truth to power even under threat of death. “This is war,” Morgan wrote today. “Let’s not #-foot around the terminology here when it comes to analyzing the sickening events in Paris over the last 48 hours.” Morgan is doing precisely what he advises others not to do when he writes”:“Let’s not #-foot around the terminology here when it comes to analyzing the sickening events in Paris over the last 48 hours.” “#” is what Morgan does best because he’s a world class wuss. Shame on Daily Mail for not seeing it.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Judi McLeod—— -- Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

Sponsored