EPA’s rule will have a devastating effect on American families, destroying millions of jobs and slashing personal incomes. Instead, allowing free markets to keep energy prices low and select reliable generation resources is a better option.
Contrary to their rhetoric, Iran and Russia were deeply chastened by sanctions, even more so by the oil price collapse, and have agreed to major concessions
About 72 percent of China’s electricity is used to power its manufacturing sector. A large part of its industrial electricity consumption—81 percent—corresponds to heavy industries like shipbuilding
Vatican tried to connect climate change with human trafficking by claiming that global warming is responsible for creating “environmental refugees” who flee their homes because of drought or other climate-caused natural disasters
We do not face a crisis of climate, but a crisis of ideology, not a crisis of rising oceans or temperatures, but rising ambitions and egos. Crisis is a work of ideology, not science, its goals are not planetary salvation, but radical social change
The EPA relies on faulty data to make exaggerated claims about the benefits of a rule that will cost Americans hundreds of billions of dollars and plunge millions of families into poverty
So, EPA, you who have been so skillful at playing the blame game and beating mining companies into bankruptcy for simple screw-ups, take a good hard look in the mirror.
Renewables should compete without subsidies, we should worry about the Smart Grid’s vulnerability from hackers, solar flares, EMPs. We should conserve energy wisely, protect nature sensibly. Let the carbon credits scheme die
Thanks to its generous public spending and a costly war against Yemen, one of the major worries for Saudi Arabia is that it is burning through its foreign reserves at an alarming pace
The double investment intermittent energy + fossil fuels, for the same total output, has pushed the price of electricity upwards wherever the switch to "green" energy is taking hold