It's not even, as CNN‘s Jake Tapper described it, that Donald Trump, Jr. is guilty of "evidence of willingness to commit collusion.”
Tapper looked serious when he said that, but what does that even mean? As Greg Jarrett on Fox News says, there is no collusion statute except in antitrust.
That's what its come down to now with the Democrats. Obstruction of justice didn’t work, so they try this. Even if collusion were a term defining criminal behavior (which it's not), who has ever been prosecuted for evidence of willingness to rob a bank if the bank never got robbed, or evidence of willingness to murder someone who never gets murdered?
