By Tom Harris —— Bio and Archives--July 9, 2010
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Back To Full Article
[Part 3 of a 6 part series examining the so-called "consensus" in the climate science community, the scientists who dare dissent from political correctness and a new, less partisan way to promote rational climate policy]
In part 1 and part 2 of this series, it was shown that the supposed consensus in the climate science community that our CO2 emissions are causing dangerous global warming is not substantiated. Here we examine the contents of a typical open letter to government in support of the CO2/climate crisis hypothesis to see if it is provides meaningful guidance to public policy formulation.The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy
Support Canada Free Press
