By Jack Dini —— Bio and Archives--March 18, 2024
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | Comments | Back To Full Article
Scientific journals release the results of scientific studies in the form of papers which, we are told are reviewed prior to publication by peers-- fellow scientists in the field who are supposed to scrutinize the manuscript and ensure that bad science doesn't get a pass. A predatory journal only pretends to do so. It exists solely to make money. It's like a parasite on the back of the scientific endeavor. What it publishes is of questionable quality. (1)
The public discourse on predatory journals often errs on the side of simplicity. There are good journals, like Nature and Science, and there are predatory journals. The bad journals often come from developing nations.
The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.
Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.
Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.
We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.
Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.
READ OUR Commenting Policy
By Jesse W Brogan on 2024 03 18
I wash this back to the Scopes Monkey Trial, where it was decided that a Jury would determine what is taught as science. They have just replaced the jury of commoners with a jury of authorized experts.
The challenge is that science is an attempt to describe reality in a way that is organized and supports prediction. It has nothing to do with the approval of the 'right' scientists. Either it increases predictability or it does not.
Support Canada Free Press
