In the current controversy engulfing survivors and families of the September 11th tragedy, unfolds a train-wreck of legal and moral claims about use of the still-leveled site. This pits supposedly well-meaning Muslims against stalwarts suspiciously opposed to Islam establishing a beachhead in the area. So, what is the right answer and who should prevail in the matter? Does a legal property right confer a larger "right" of development within a community, regardless of any other issues?
