WhatFinger

The government censoring viewpoints it disagrees with is a direct affront to free speech and offensive to the First Amendment

SCOTUS Considers Government Censorship of Social Media


WASHINGTON D.C. – Today, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri where Missouri and Louisiana assert Biden administration officials violated the First Amendment by illegally coercing Big Tech companies to censor and suppress constitutionally-protected viewpoints on social media. The High Court is considering whether the government illegally coerced, or just legally persuaded, social media companies such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google into suppressing content on a wide range of issues.

Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy


CFP Comments


Comments

By rustynail on 2024 03 19

The former head lawyer for the FBLie was the Head Lawyer for Twitter. The censoring was always to the Right, never the Left.
This is obvious suppression of free speech.



Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Recommended by Canada Free Press


Subscribe

Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->