WhatFinger

Damage that Resolution 2334 is liable to cause Israel in the international arena and in its relations with foreign states and international entities, including in the legal and economic spheres, should not be underestimated

Security Council Resolution 2334: The Legal Significance


By -- Pnina Sharvit Baruch—— Bio and Archives--December 30, 2016

World News | Comments | Back To Full Article

On December 23, 2016, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2334 on the Jewish settlements, after the United States abstained from the vote and all other 14 members voted in favor. The Security Council resolution was the first to include such a firm condemnation of the Israeli government’s policy on the settlements since Resolution 465 in 1980. A key motif in the resolution, as emphasized in paragraph 4, is the need to cease all activity concerning the settlements in order to salvage the two-state solution. The preamble to the resolution condemns “all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem” and expresses “grave concern that continuing Israeli settlement activities are dangerously imperilling the viability of the two-State solution based on the 1967 lines.” The resolution stipulates that measures should be taken “to reverse the negative trends on the ground which are steadily eroding the two-State solution and entrenching a one-State reality." These statements, as well as the explanations given by Secretary Kerry and other American administration sources for the United States abstention in the vote, underscore the focus of the resolution on the effort to halt Israeli measures perceived as liable to thwart the implementation of a two-state solution. This refers primarily to construction outside the settlement blocs and Israeli legislative initiatives perceived as intended to change the legal status of the area, along with statements by senior members of the Israeli government members about the end of the two-state era. While the resolution expresses a double standard toward Israel on the part of the countries of the world, these measures by the Israeli government are probably what led to the resolution, on top of the poor relations between the Israeli government and the American administration.
Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy


CFP Comments

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments


Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Recommended by Canada Free Press


Subscribe

Sponsored